<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon, eBay privacy lobbying sparks cut-and-paste crowdsourcing drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/11/amazon-ebay-privacy-lobbying-sparks-cut-and-paste-crowdsourcing-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/11/amazon-ebay-privacy-lobbying-sparks-cut-and-paste-crowdsourcing-drive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrassRootsGuy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/11/amazon-ebay-privacy-lobbying-sparks-cut-and-paste-crowdsourcing-drive/#comment-1310943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GrassRootsGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=609401#comment-1310943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposing legislation is just a start point for discussion anyway. You throw into the public square ideas and then debate them. Most individual privacy advocates don&#039;t have specific ideas or know how to write them into law.

Hearing from corporate interests allow you to rebut them.

Elected officials will test the wind and go with the flow for the most part. Your job is to make the wind blow by pushing your own ideas.

http://youtu.be/8eUFmPoAKY0

###]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposing legislation is just a start point for discussion anyway. You throw into the public square ideas and then debate them. Most individual privacy advocates don&#8217;t have specific ideas or know how to write them into law.</p>
<p>Hearing from corporate interests allow you to rebut them.</p>
<p>Elected officials will test the wind and go with the flow for the most part. Your job is to make the wind blow by pushing your own ideas.</p>
<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='604' height='370' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/8eUFmPoAKY0?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>###</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iribal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/11/amazon-ebay-privacy-lobbying-sparks-cut-and-paste-crowdsourcing-drive/#comment-1310875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iribal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=609401#comment-1310875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great information to have--but it&#039;s not a given that this practice is nefarious. What if the parliamentarians proposing amendments actually found those arguments convincing? Were they obligated to rephrase them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information to have&#8211;but it&#8217;s not a given that this practice is nefarious. What if the parliamentarians proposing amendments actually found those arguments convincing? Were they obligated to rephrase them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>