<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter officially reels in Bluefin Labs, as social TV gets interesting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/twitter-officially-reels-in-bluefin-labs-as-social-tv-gets-interesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/twitter-officially-reels-in-bluefin-labs-as-social-tv-gets-interesting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricdesan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/twitter-officially-reels-in-bluefin-labs-as-social-tv-gets-interesting/#comment-1308857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricdesan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607733#comment-1308857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find this highly suspect right out of the gate as television and Internet social platforms are apples and oranges. More likely, I could believe this acq-hire would be used to legitimize some monetization strategy built around some hair-brained quasi-branding scheme that wont be effective because it will be based on the display paradigm that is quickly becoming useless and obsolete.

You better do more than this Twitter if you want innovate on your platform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this highly suspect right out of the gate as television and Internet social platforms are apples and oranges. More likely, I could believe this acq-hire would be used to legitimize some monetization strategy built around some hair-brained quasi-branding scheme that wont be effective because it will be based on the display paradigm that is quickly becoming useless and obsolete.</p>
<p>You better do more than this Twitter if you want innovate on your platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
