<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instagram hits the desktop web, but photo uploading remains mobile-first</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:43:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/#comment-1333957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607554#comment-1333957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#039;s a bummer that we can&#039;t upload ... I would presume that since they have so many other sites just with the capability of viewing and interacting, that Instagram would at least provide an advantage to using their own platform from desktop. Maybe it&#039;s in the works w/ them ... ???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a bummer that we can&#8217;t upload &#8230; I would presume that since they have so many other sites just with the capability of viewing and interacting, that Instagram would at least provide an advantage to using their own platform from desktop. Maybe it&#8217;s in the works w/ them &#8230; ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/#comment-1325503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607554#comment-1325503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not really sure what the point of having a desktop version of Instagram is, if you&#039;re not going to allow people to upload photos. I mean, why would those who use Instatram on their phones ever access the desktop site? People who didn&#039;t have the app already could click through Twitter links or view the photos on their friends&#039; Facebook walls - I don&#039;t see how adding a desktop version furthers anything besides being a narcisstic &quot;ooh, look at all the pretty photos I have!&quot;

Very recently Instagram stopped support of an older version of Instagram and now gives me an error when I try to post, so unless there is a way to upload photos using the desktop interface, I guess I&#039;m not using it anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure what the point of having a desktop version of Instagram is, if you&#8217;re not going to allow people to upload photos. I mean, why would those who use Instatram on their phones ever access the desktop site? People who didn&#8217;t have the app already could click through Twitter links or view the photos on their friends&#8217; Facebook walls &#8211; I don&#8217;t see how adding a desktop version furthers anything besides being a narcisstic &#8220;ooh, look at all the pretty photos I have!&#8221;</p>
<p>Very recently Instagram stopped support of an older version of Instagram and now gives me an error when I try to post, so unless there is a way to upload photos using the desktop interface, I guess I&#8217;m not using it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Naing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/#comment-1316065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Naing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607554#comment-1316065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the summary says facebook, isnt it supposed to say instagram?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the summary says facebook, isnt it supposed to say instagram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/instagram-hits-the-desktop-web-but-photo-uploading-remains-mobile-first/#comment-1308956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607554#comment-1308956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eliza, I&#039;m glad to see Instagram is sticking to its standard. &quot;Instagram, at its core, is about seeing and taking photos on-the-go.&quot; As an Instagram user, I don&#039;t really enjoy scrolling down my feed and seeing images that people obviously did not snap with their mobile device but instead downloaded to their device and are uploading into the app. I&#039;m a big fan of keeping Instagram full of on-the-go photos and not much else. Being able to browse images or utilize social features of Instagram on the web or via desktop program makes sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliza, I&#8217;m glad to see Instagram is sticking to its standard. &#8220;Instagram, at its core, is about seeing and taking photos on-the-go.&#8221; As an Instagram user, I don&#8217;t really enjoy scrolling down my feed and seeing images that people obviously did not snap with their mobile device but instead downloaded to their device and are uploading into the app. I&#8217;m a big fan of keeping Instagram full of on-the-go photos and not much else. Being able to browse images or utilize social features of Instagram on the web or via desktop program makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
