<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Dell should go big now that it has gone private</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/how-dell-should-go-big-now-that-it-has-gone-private/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/how-dell-should-go-big-now-that-it-has-gone-private/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hutchy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/how-dell-should-go-big-now-that-it-has-gone-private/#comment-1308751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hutchy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607355#comment-1308751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell should be investing in 3D printing not big data. Dell definitely does not need a database or a platform. 

Dell should be focusing on building its Force10 network hardware not cloud services. Further supporting the ONF and taking on Cisco.

Stick to what its relatively good at, mass manufacturing of simple cheap reliable hardware.

Cheers,
Hutchy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell should be investing in 3D printing not big data. Dell definitely does not need a database or a platform. </p>
<p>Dell should be focusing on building its Force10 network hardware not cloud services. Further supporting the ONF and taking on Cisco.</p>
<p>Stick to what its relatively good at, mass manufacturing of simple cheap reliable hardware.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Hutchy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/how-dell-should-go-big-now-that-it-has-gone-private/#comment-1308612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607355#comment-1308612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some interesting points, Derrick. I agree that Dell should (and is) make a coherent big data play, but am less convinced that an acquisition is the answer.

EMC, Oracle, IBM, HP et al have acquired big data software/services companies, and have been reasonably successful as a result. But they have used these acquisitions to deliver appliances into the market; the acquired software, running on top-end (expensive) hardware.

Dell&#039;s whole proposition is around more affordable, commodity, kit. It&#039;s far less compelling as an appliance.

Closer partnerships with Cloudera, HortonWorks et al, though? That could work pretty well. As Dell have done with Eucalyptus, Ubuntu, etc, they could sell (cheap) hardware with the software already installed. They could partner, and make it as painless as possible for Cloudera/HortonWorks/MapR/whoever customers to order and deploy clusters of Dell kit.

It&#039;s not a high margin business, and it doesn&#039;t have much (or any!) scope for defensible differentiation, but that&#039;s been Dell&#039;s story from the outset. They&#039;ll succeed by being a little bit easier to deploy than their competitors, a little bit cheaper than their competitors, and (hopefully!) by managing supply chains to ensure their margins are a little bit healthier than their competitors…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting points, Derrick. I agree that Dell should (and is) make a coherent big data play, but am less convinced that an acquisition is the answer.</p>
<p>EMC, Oracle, IBM, HP et al have acquired big data software/services companies, and have been reasonably successful as a result. But they have used these acquisitions to deliver appliances into the market; the acquired software, running on top-end (expensive) hardware.</p>
<p>Dell&#8217;s whole proposition is around more affordable, commodity, kit. It&#8217;s far less compelling as an appliance.</p>
<p>Closer partnerships with Cloudera, HortonWorks et al, though? That could work pretty well. As Dell have done with Eucalyptus, Ubuntu, etc, they could sell (cheap) hardware with the software already installed. They could partner, and make it as painless as possible for Cloudera/HortonWorks/MapR/whoever customers to order and deploy clusters of Dell kit.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a high margin business, and it doesn&#8217;t have much (or any!) scope for defensible differentiation, but that&#8217;s been Dell&#8217;s story from the outset. They&#8217;ll succeed by being a little bit easier to deploy than their competitors, a little bit cheaper than their competitors, and (hopefully!) by managing supply chains to ensure their margins are a little bit healthier than their competitors…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/05/how-dell-should-go-big-now-that-it-has-gone-private/#comment-1308488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=607355#comment-1308488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell&#039;s DNA is opportunity chaser, also known as Ambulance chaser for a different profession. No real R&amp;D no idea what SW can and can&#039;t do, no vision how to improve computing neither for consumers or businesses.  So they will chase IBM and HP and Oracle and wither away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell&#8217;s DNA is opportunity chaser, also known as Ambulance chaser for a different profession. No real R&amp;D no idea what SW can and can&#8217;t do, no vision how to improve computing neither for consumers or businesses.  So they will chase IBM and HP and Oracle and wither away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
