<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huawei finds favor at CERN: researchers sign up for more UDS cloud storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/02/01/huawei-finds-favor-at-cern-researchers-sign-up-for-more-uds-cloud-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/01/huawei-finds-favor-at-cern-researchers-sign-up-for-more-uds-cloud-storage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/01/huawei-finds-favor-at-cern-researchers-sign-up-for-more-uds-cloud-storage/#comment-1313946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=606529#comment-1313946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to make a point here for a very usual mistake people makes. You say:

&quot;... and claims eleven-nines (99.999999999 percent) reliability, so users theoretically don’t need to back up data stored in a UDS-toting cloud.&quot;

RAID (or similar solutions) is not backup. Let me explain this. So, you have a superdistributed, megareliant, ultragood filesystem that gives you 100% reliability because you can go through dozens of failed servers and hundreds of servers, but... if by a mistake someone goes inside the filesystem and delete all the files... don&#039;t you need a backup for getting them back?

Also, even with all that numbers, if you are storing exabites of thata... you should take care of it ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to make a point here for a very usual mistake people makes. You say:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; and claims eleven-nines (99.999999999 percent) reliability, so users theoretically don’t need to back up data stored in a UDS-toting cloud.&#8221;</p>
<p>RAID (or similar solutions) is not backup. Let me explain this. So, you have a superdistributed, megareliant, ultragood filesystem that gives you 100% reliability because you can go through dozens of failed servers and hundreds of servers, but&#8230; if by a mistake someone goes inside the filesystem and delete all the files&#8230; don&#8217;t you need a backup for getting them back?</p>
<p>Also, even with all that numbers, if you are storing exabites of thata&#8230; you should take care of it ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/01/huawei-finds-favor-at-cern-researchers-sign-up-for-more-uds-cloud-storage/#comment-1307901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marvl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=606529#comment-1307901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news! Good technical idea!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news! Good technical idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Pekkarinen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/02/01/huawei-finds-favor-at-cern-researchers-sign-up-for-more-uds-cloud-storage/#comment-1306918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petri Pekkarinen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 06:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=606529#comment-1306918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article, thought I don&#039;t really appreciate the heading - after all, it&#039;s the World&#039;s most innovative massive scale storage...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, thought I don&#8217;t really appreciate the heading &#8211; after all, it&#8217;s the World&#8217;s most innovative massive scale storage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
