<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage for the grand French cloud? Inktank partners with eNovance on Ceph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/30/storage-for-the-grand-french-cloud-inktank-partners-with-enovance-on-ceph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/30/storage-for-the-grand-french-cloud-inktank-partners-with-enovance-on-ceph/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/30/storage-for-the-grand-french-cloud-inktank-partners-with-enovance-on-ceph/#comment-1306926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=605734#comment-1306926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While possible this would be a disaster for performances reasons]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While possible this would be a disaster for performances reasons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GillesMo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/30/storage-for-the-grand-french-cloud-inktank-partners-with-enovance-on-ceph/#comment-1306506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GillesMo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=605734#comment-1306506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t be surprised if Swift can be stored on Ceph...
Ceph is low level (block), Swift is an object store, and need a storage volume.
So Swift and Ceph is not incompatible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be surprised if Swift can be stored on Ceph&#8230;<br />
Ceph is low level (block), Swift is an object store, and need a storage volume.<br />
So Swift and Ceph is not incompatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/30/storage-for-the-grand-french-cloud-inktank-partners-with-enovance-on-ceph/#comment-1306411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=605734#comment-1306411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a friend of mine told me they are using OpenStack Swift and not Ceph.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a friend of mine told me they are using OpenStack Swift and not Ceph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
