<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware pours $30M more into Puppet Labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/23/vmware-pours-30m-more-into-puppet-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/23/vmware-pours-30m-more-into-puppet-labs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben46</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/23/vmware-pours-30m-more-into-puppet-labs/#comment-1308378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ben46]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=603160#comment-1308378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hopefully they will continue to maintain the community edition ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they will continue to maintain the community edition &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/23/vmware-pours-30m-more-into-puppet-labs/#comment-1303173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=603160#comment-1303173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right. CloudFoundry may be the future, but VMware was stuck when it came to capitalizing on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right. CloudFoundry may be the future, but VMware was stuck when it came to capitalizing on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinclairschuller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/23/vmware-pours-30m-more-into-puppet-labs/#comment-1302816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sinclairschuller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=603160#comment-1302816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that isn&#039;t really talked about is what this all means in the context of the CloudFoundry spin out. I doubt they would have made this aggressive of an investment if CloudFoundry was still part of the VMware brand. Maybe this is evidence that CloudFoundry was shacking their strategy options. I wrote about it here: http://apprenda.com/blog/general/vmwares-puppetlabs-investment-a-cloudfoundry-hedge/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that isn&#8217;t really talked about is what this all means in the context of the CloudFoundry spin out. I doubt they would have made this aggressive of an investment if CloudFoundry was still part of the VMware brand. Maybe this is evidence that CloudFoundry was shacking their strategy options. I wrote about it here: <a href="http://apprenda.com/blog/general/vmwares-puppetlabs-investment-a-cloudfoundry-hedge/" rel="nofollow">http://apprenda.com/blog/general/vmwares-puppetlabs-investment-a-cloudfoundry-hedge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
