<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharp cuts iPad display production. Will iPad mini be the bigger hit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ask Sharp and/or Apple to comment on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ask Sharp and/or Apple to comment on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Robinson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Robinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say that the comparison would be iPad mini and iPad 2--hence, the differential is even lower-- at only $70!!

The mini is the entry drug of choice.  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that the comparison would be iPad mini and iPad 2&#8211;hence, the differential is even lower&#8211; at only $70!!</p>
<p>The mini is the entry drug of choice.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Paredes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Paredes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPad Mini is the perfect size, and most of the new iPads I see in the corporate environment are that smaller version. It is so perfect for notes and and communication.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPad Mini is the perfect size, and most of the new iPads I see in the corporate environment are that smaller version. It is so perfect for notes and and communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks AJ - I used my Android calculator for the math. ;) Just kidding; updated with the correction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks AJ &#8211; I used my Android calculator for the math. ;) Just kidding; updated with the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[499-329=170]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>499-329=170</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the catch, Jos; just updated the post to remove the word mini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the catch, Jos; just updated the post to remove the word mini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/18/sharp-cuts-ipad-display-production-will-ipad-mini-be-the-bigger-hit/#comment-1300649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=602362#comment-1300649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;drastically cut production of 9.7-inch iPad mini screens&quot; You mean iPad, not iPad mini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;drastically cut production of 9.7-inch iPad mini screens&#8221; You mean iPad, not iPad mini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
