<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC set to release more spectrum to feed our need for Wi-Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/fcc-set-to-release-more-spectrum-to-feed-our-need-for-wi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/fcc-set-to-release-more-spectrum-to-feed-our-need-for-wi-fi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crowley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/fcc-set-to-release-more-spectrum-to-feed-our-need-for-wi-fi/#comment-1296956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Crowley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600606#comment-1296956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 35% increase is nice, but it seems to me the current &quot;airport&quot; problem is primarily driven by factors other than a lack of 5 GHz spectrum. One factor is lack of deployment in current 5 GHz spectrum, and WLANs at both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz that were deployed as an afterthought, and should be re-engineered.  But, we&#039;ll use the 35% eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 35% increase is nice, but it seems to me the current &#8220;airport&#8221; problem is primarily driven by factors other than a lack of 5 GHz spectrum. One factor is lack of deployment in current 5 GHz spectrum, and WLANs at both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz that were deployed as an afterthought, and should be re-engineered.  But, we&#8217;ll use the 35% eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Destry MMM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/fcc-set-to-release-more-spectrum-to-feed-our-need-for-wi-fi/#comment-1296720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Destry MMM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600606#comment-1296720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be great as I have a company that specializes in Long Range Wireless Links for many different devices. 5 gig smaller antennas, higher gain....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be great as I have a company that specializes in Long Range Wireless Links for many different devices. 5 gig smaller antennas, higher gain&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Destry MMM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/fcc-set-to-release-more-spectrum-to-feed-our-need-for-wi-fi/#comment-1296719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Destry MMM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600606#comment-1296719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>