<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A peek inside China&#8217;s internet giants and their massive scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Sheed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1298337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence Sheed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1298337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a bit wary of numbers like 100,000 servers added in a year.

Given that I do spend a bit of time going deaf in data centers here in China, I don&#039;t see that being physically possible.

I can _believe_ they add up to 100,000 virtual machines in a year, which would run on a lesser number of machines - 20,000 would be in the realm of possible, although there really isn&#039;t that much ip space available here, and ip6 is still not really rolled out for the masses yet.   If they&#039;re counting those rather overpriced  dense blade servers as multiple units, then sure, can do 96 in a 4U, but thats not really playing fair with numbers..

Hmm... thinking about it
1000 x 4U @ 96 = 100,000k+- is eminently doable..., although you pretty much have to build your own power infrastructure for that, as data centers here are more concerned about power than bandwidth..  Isn&#039;t strictly speaking 100k servers though.

I can believe 100k machines assuming heavy blade dense (although I would probably be looking into re-architecting, and making regional / subregional cloud load balancers if I was doing it that way).

IP Space is the real issue.
Most of it is being stuck behind load balancers anyway, but even so, we&#039;re pretty much out of ip space here in .cn


@forestzrd pretty much has it down pat.

It will be interesting when Alibaba starts promoting their aliyun cloud service more heavily. 
Its either Youku, Alibaba, or Tencent who will aim to become the next amazon web server competitor here.

Lawrence]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit wary of numbers like 100,000 servers added in a year.</p>
<p>Given that I do spend a bit of time going deaf in data centers here in China, I don&#8217;t see that being physically possible.</p>
<p>I can _believe_ they add up to 100,000 virtual machines in a year, which would run on a lesser number of machines &#8211; 20,000 would be in the realm of possible, although there really isn&#8217;t that much ip space available here, and ip6 is still not really rolled out for the masses yet.   If they&#8217;re counting those rather overpriced  dense blade servers as multiple units, then sure, can do 96 in a 4U, but thats not really playing fair with numbers..</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; thinking about it<br />
1000 x 4U @ 96 = 100,000k+- is eminently doable&#8230;, although you pretty much have to build your own power infrastructure for that, as data centers here are more concerned about power than bandwidth..  Isn&#8217;t strictly speaking 100k servers though.</p>
<p>I can believe 100k machines assuming heavy blade dense (although I would probably be looking into re-architecting, and making regional / subregional cloud load balancers if I was doing it that way).</p>
<p>IP Space is the real issue.<br />
Most of it is being stuck behind load balancers anyway, but even so, we&#8217;re pretty much out of ip space here in .cn</p>
<p>@forestzrd pretty much has it down pat.</p>
<p>It will be interesting when Alibaba starts promoting their aliyun cloud service more heavily.<br />
Its either Youku, Alibaba, or Tencent who will aim to become the next amazon web server competitor here.</p>
<p>Lawrence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yang</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1297815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 01:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1297815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hou about your country]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hou about your country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lama-islam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1297379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lama-islam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1297379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 800 million users on QQ, to be honest. And a QQ International IM suite in 5 languages which can beat MSN hands down any time. Tencent rocks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 800 million users on QQ, to be honest. And a QQ International IM suite in 5 languages which can beat MSN hands down any time. Tencent rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tone it Down</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1297299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tone it Down]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1297299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well, perhaps we forget that a lot of innovation even in Silicon Valley come from foreigners (many Chinese engineers). And, so, we may want to tone down the superiority of silicon valley. if all the immigrants leave, Silicon Valley might also be copying from India, China and Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, perhaps we forget that a lot of innovation even in Silicon Valley come from foreigners (many Chinese engineers). And, so, we may want to tone down the superiority of silicon valley. if all the immigrants leave, Silicon Valley might also be copying from India, China and Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forestzrd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1296785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forestzrd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1296785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great blog! You&#039;ve just shared the great insights about so called &#039;BATS&#039;(Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent and Sina(weibo)) camp - giant internet companies. 

It&#039;s true that they are &#039;big&#039; from business volume perspective but not &#039;strong&#039; from technical innovation perspective compared with counterparts in America. Though they are much agile and innovative compared with local IT and telco companies.

Talking about cloud computing... i still hold highest expectation on these internet giants based on their capability of technical scale-out, experience of web scale operation, agility of innovation and of course financial advantages... much similar pattern in other countries and regions. This expectation already backed by facts:

1. Sina SAE(Sina App Engine) is no. 1 public PaaS in China which could be roughly corresponded to Google GAE(Google App Engine). Sina&#039;s cloud ambition is not ended at PaaS... with their active involvement in OpenStack community and Beta SWS(Sina Web Service - AWS alike naming) we can expect their excellent play in IaaS arena.

2. Alibaba  Aliyun is no.1 public IaaS in China which could be corresponded to Amazon AWS... and with the re-org within Alibaba group - merger between Aliyun and Net.cn(the largest DNS and web hoster for SMEs) recently, seems no. 1 IaaS provider in China is firmly laid.

3.  Tencent just released news that they will debut full-blown IaaS &amp; PaaS services.few minutes ago...Tencent was &#039;notorious&#039; for years as &#039;startup killer&#039; and &#039;innovation killer&#039;:) I will never doubt that Tencent will be one of the major &#039;Cloud Killer&#039; in China.

Well talking about GFW(Great Firewall)...it&#039;s a little bit complex. 
People don&#039;t like it, &#039;Cloudant&#039; especially! With GFW, we can&#039;t leverage many many great cloud services especially Google services for the well-known reasons. The situation is getting worse due to MIIT regulations on telco VAT license issue... unfortunately cloud services fall into telco VAT. The situation could and might be changed somehow after the Azure&#039;s landing in China as a milestone just one or two months ago... and in that case Microsoft make their cloud way to China with workaround - cooperating with local government and local IDC service provider. JV will be another workaround majorly used by cloud giants from abroad.
While local CSP(Cloud Service Providers) should thank GFW &amp; regulations and wish it long live as long as possible:) which buy them much time and space to survive or grow big just like what happened in Web and Web2.0 era.

There will be cloud giants in China just like what happened 10 years back in internet or web era thanks to this huge population and therefore huge market! BTW, would thank all the smart guys and their innovation in silicon valley, diligent and hard working chinese will &#039;copy-cat&#039;  again and end up eventually with quite some cloud business giants again:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog! You&#8217;ve just shared the great insights about so called &#8216;BATS&#8217;(Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent and Sina(weibo)) camp &#8211; giant internet companies. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that they are &#8216;big&#8217; from business volume perspective but not &#8216;strong&#8217; from technical innovation perspective compared with counterparts in America. Though they are much agile and innovative compared with local IT and telco companies.</p>
<p>Talking about cloud computing&#8230; i still hold highest expectation on these internet giants based on their capability of technical scale-out, experience of web scale operation, agility of innovation and of course financial advantages&#8230; much similar pattern in other countries and regions. This expectation already backed by facts:</p>
<p>1. Sina SAE(Sina App Engine) is no. 1 public PaaS in China which could be roughly corresponded to Google GAE(Google App Engine). Sina&#8217;s cloud ambition is not ended at PaaS&#8230; with their active involvement in OpenStack community and Beta SWS(Sina Web Service &#8211; AWS alike naming) we can expect their excellent play in IaaS arena.</p>
<p>2. Alibaba  Aliyun is no.1 public IaaS in China which could be corresponded to Amazon AWS&#8230; and with the re-org within Alibaba group &#8211; merger between Aliyun and Net.cn(the largest DNS and web hoster for SMEs) recently, seems no. 1 IaaS provider in China is firmly laid.</p>
<p>3.  Tencent just released news that they will debut full-blown IaaS &amp; PaaS services.few minutes ago&#8230;Tencent was &#8216;notorious&#8217; for years as &#8216;startup killer&#8217; and &#8216;innovation killer&#8217;:) I will never doubt that Tencent will be one of the major &#8216;Cloud Killer&#8217; in China.</p>
<p>Well talking about GFW(Great Firewall)&#8230;it&#8217;s a little bit complex.<br />
People don&#8217;t like it, &#8216;Cloudant&#8217; especially! With GFW, we can&#8217;t leverage many many great cloud services especially Google services for the well-known reasons. The situation is getting worse due to MIIT regulations on telco VAT license issue&#8230; unfortunately cloud services fall into telco VAT. The situation could and might be changed somehow after the Azure&#8217;s landing in China as a milestone just one or two months ago&#8230; and in that case Microsoft make their cloud way to China with workaround &#8211; cooperating with local government and local IDC service provider. JV will be another workaround majorly used by cloud giants from abroad.<br />
While local CSP(Cloud Service Providers) should thank GFW &amp; regulations and wish it long live as long as possible:) which buy them much time and space to survive or grow big just like what happened in Web and Web2.0 era.</p>
<p>There will be cloud giants in China just like what happened 10 years back in internet or web era thanks to this huge population and therefore huge market! BTW, would thank all the smart guys and their innovation in silicon valley, diligent and hard working chinese will &#8216;copy-cat&#8217;  again and end up eventually with quite some cloud business giants again:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1296778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1296778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget:

Tencent owns WeChat which is essentially Path + Whatsapp +Talkbox. 300 million users and expanding internationally.

Qzone is mostly predominant in Tier 2-4 cities. The Facebook of China is Renren (college kids) and Kaixin (white collar workers)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget:</p>
<p>Tencent owns WeChat which is essentially Path + Whatsapp +Talkbox. 300 million users and expanding internationally.</p>
<p>Qzone is mostly predominant in Tier 2-4 cities. The Facebook of China is Renren (college kids) and Kaixin (white collar workers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1296740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1296740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;because while the government can censor official news outlets, it can’t possibly control the stream of information coming off Weibo.&quot;

You&#039;re misinformed there. If they can&#039;t control it, they&#039;ll close it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;because while the government can censor official news outlets, it can’t possibly control the stream of information coming off Weibo.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re misinformed there. If they can&#8217;t control it, they&#8217;ll close it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer-Information-Systems</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/09/a-peek-inside-chinas-internet-giants-and-their-massive-scale/#comment-1296676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Computer-Information-Systems]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=600420#comment-1296676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://computerinformationsystems.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/770/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Information-Systems&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
Wow the sheer scale is amazing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://computerinformationsystems.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/770/" rel="nofollow">Information-Systems</a> and commented:<br />
Wow the sheer scale is amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
