4 Comments

Summary:

In a new research note, Macquarie Capital contends that Amazon Web Services is not only profitable, it would be a $19 billion business if it were counted as a standalone entity. That’s not peanuts. Amazon, of course, isn’t saying boo.

Amazon Web Services
photo: Flickr/Will Merydith

If you want a good debate, just ask a group of pundits about the size and profitability of Amazon Web Services then sit back with some popcorn. There are two main schools of thought: One holds that AWS is a business with razor-thin margins that is underwritten by the Amazon retail juggernaut and should that business take a tumble, AWS will fall with it. The other holds that Amazon makes good dough off of AWS, and that it could be a viable standalone business unit.

Count Macquarie Capital in the second camp. In a new research note, Macquarie estimates that the overall cloud market will hit $71 billion in 2015 and pegged AWS’ addressable part of that market at $38 billion. Those numbers are considerably larger than Gartner’s previous estimates of $56 billion for the overall cloud market size and $28 billion for AWS’ piece of the pie. In the note, analyst Ben Schachter said AWS could now be worth $19 billion as a standalone entity, based on a 5X multiple of Macquarie’s 2013 AWS revenue estimate of $3.8 billion, or $30 billion using an 8X multiple.

macquarie2aws

Macquarie is betting that growing enterprise adoption — a key AWS priority — will feed that momentum. According to the report:

“We highlight that much of AWS‟s past growth has come from SMBs [small and medium businesses] and start-ups. While these will continue to drive growth globally, in 2013 we expect a more concerted effort to focus on growing the AWS business at large enterprises. Importantly, the broadening platform offered by AWS is helping to drive adoption in larger enterprises (moving up the tech stack, with RedShift and other recent product launches). Additionally, we think emerging markets offer a significant opportunity, as many enterprises in these regions will likely bypass traditional technology infrastructure and go straight to the cloud.”

Redshift is the new data warehousing solution Amazon announced at AWS:Reinvent two months ago and that takes aim at expensive solutions from Hewlett-Packard (Vertica), Oracle, SAP, and IBM

awsprofit

Of course all of these estimates are based on analysis of numbers that Amazon doesn’t provide. The company lumps AWS revenue in  with “other” revenue from marketing and promotion activities, other seller sites and co-branded credit cards. Given that, AWS remains pretty much a black box, but I would be willing to bet, all of  Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ talk of low-margin, high-volume business aside, that Amazon is not doing cloud services as a philanthropic exercise.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Martin Bergstrom Monday, January 7, 2013

    I don’t have access to the necessary data to confirm this study, but it makes great logical sense. Cloud computing is still in its relative infancy but is really starting to take off with small to medium sized start-up firms and, as the study states, should do well in emerging markets where it will be easier to outsource heavy IT capabilities than construct new data centers. This is especially true in Northern Latin America and Africa, both of which are experiencing high levels of growth and have climates poorly suited to native data centers (high temperatures or humidity and erratic local utilities). Moreover, despite this potential, the data centers necessary for consistent cloud computing capabilities are highly advanced and expensive, it is difficult for newcomers to enter the market quickly, giving companies that already have these capabilities or that can easily adapt existing infrastructure to contain cloud structures temporary monopolies that should ensure decent profit margins in the near future. Considering all these factors, Amazon is very well placed to extract value from its Cloud Computing Services. Even if revenues are not as high as this study estimates, I would put my chips in Amazons corner for the easily foreseeable future of cloud computing

  2. Robert Cathey Monday, January 7, 2013

    Spinoff.

  3. My understanding that (unlike Amazon’s main retail business) AWS was never a “low-margin” operation with returns on or around 30% to be gradually reduce as and when competition takes place.
    Why would AWS operate at “book” margins when they’re the biggest and best initial offering in town? Harvest what you can and incrementally reduce prices as competition becomes available to both remain competitive and raise the cost of entry to newer Cloud providers.

  4. Olof Lindgren Tuesday, January 8, 2013

    I wonder why Macqarie believes AWS’ gross profit equals its revenue…

Comments have been disabled for this post