<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google wins: a plain English guide to the FTC&#8217;s big ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcasislandtv</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/#comment-1318209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orcasislandtv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=598745#comment-1318209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard to believe Google is asserting &#039;free speech&#039; corporate rights (a result of the Supreme Court ruling that Corporations are now the equivalent of a single Citizen as far as the Constitution and Bill of Rights goes. Who 250 years ago was thinking a 500 billion dollar Corporation was a Citizen? 

Too bad corrupting search results is OK by the FTC. No one should have to hold Google accountable, they should do it themselves, but the FTC has lost my confidence by simply knuckling under and agreeing Google has &#039;free speech&#039; rights in its software. 

I expect anything I use with a Google in it, Android, Google Docs, Gmail, G+ etc, Google will now claim any mis-behavior is &#039;free speech&#039; .. Trust isn&#039;t something Google should have messed with, irrespective of the FTC&#039;s allowing it to go south. The Judge will be the market, unfortunately. I think the FTC could have saved Google&#039;s bacon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe Google is asserting &#8216;free speech&#8217; corporate rights (a result of the Supreme Court ruling that Corporations are now the equivalent of a single Citizen as far as the Constitution and Bill of Rights goes. Who 250 years ago was thinking a 500 billion dollar Corporation was a Citizen? </p>
<p>Too bad corrupting search results is OK by the FTC. No one should have to hold Google accountable, they should do it themselves, but the FTC has lost my confidence by simply knuckling under and agreeing Google has &#8216;free speech&#8217; rights in its software. </p>
<p>I expect anything I use with a Google in it, Android, Google Docs, Gmail, G+ etc, Google will now claim any mis-behavior is &#8216;free speech&#8217; .. Trust isn&#8217;t something Google should have messed with, irrespective of the FTC&#8217;s allowing it to go south. The Judge will be the market, unfortunately. I think the FTC could have saved Google&#8217;s bacon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danox</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/#comment-1294125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=598745#comment-1294125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Felipe your sums are off Motorola has lost nearly 900 million dollars in the first three quarters of 2012, and when the last quarter is counted Motorola will have lost nearly 2 billion in 2012, that isn&#039;t a win except in some Geek&#039;s basement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felipe your sums are off Motorola has lost nearly 900 million dollars in the first three quarters of 2012, and when the last quarter is counted Motorola will have lost nearly 2 billion in 2012, that isn&#8217;t a win except in some Geek&#8217;s basement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felipe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/#comment-1292870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=598745#comment-1292870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end Motorola was way cheaper than 12.5 billion for Google.

&#039;At $12.5B, Motorola is Google’s largest acquisition to date. Google paid $40 / share in cash, but received ~$11 / share in cash and $8 / share in deferred tax assets. Thus the value ascribed to operations + patents was about $21 / share, or $6.3B, reflecting a multiple of ~0.5x sales and 12x EBITDA. Now adjusting this further for the $2.35B total consideration Google is expected to receive for the Motorola Home business, we get a purchase price of just under $4B for Motorola&#039;s handset business and patent portfolio (17K patents and 7.5K patent applications). This compares very favorably to recent patent deals such as Apple, Microsoft, RIM, Sony, Ericsson, and EMC paying $4.5B for 6K patents (July ’11) and Microsoft paying $1B for 800+ AOL patents (April ’12). Based on a sum of the parts, one could conclude Google acquired either the handset or its patents for a very minimal cost.&#039; 

http://www.zdnet.com/googles-motorola-purchase-was-it-worth-it-7000009356/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end Motorola was way cheaper than 12.5 billion for Google.</p>
<p>&#8216;At $12.5B, Motorola is Google’s largest acquisition to date. Google paid $40 / share in cash, but received ~$11 / share in cash and $8 / share in deferred tax assets. Thus the value ascribed to operations + patents was about $21 / share, or $6.3B, reflecting a multiple of ~0.5x sales and 12x EBITDA. Now adjusting this further for the $2.35B total consideration Google is expected to receive for the Motorola Home business, we get a purchase price of just under $4B for Motorola&#8217;s handset business and patent portfolio (17K patents and 7.5K patent applications). This compares very favorably to recent patent deals such as Apple, Microsoft, RIM, Sony, Ericsson, and EMC paying $4.5B for 6K patents (July ’11) and Microsoft paying $1B for 800+ AOL patents (April ’12). Based on a sum of the parts, one could conclude Google acquired either the handset or its patents for a very minimal cost.&#8217; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/googles-motorola-purchase-was-it-worth-it-7000009356/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdnet.com/googles-motorola-purchase-was-it-worth-it-7000009356/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottph</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2013/01/03/google-wins-a-plain-english-guide-to-the-ftcs-big-ruling/#comment-1292759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=598745#comment-1292759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12,5 billion for Motorolas patents to force competitors into unfair license agreements...for nothing, and you say Google won? Ok.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12,5 billion for Motorolas patents to force competitors into unfair license agreements&#8230;for nothing, and you say Google won? Ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
