Comments on: USPTO rejects another Apple patent — but it’s far from dead http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/uspto-rejects-another-apple-patent-but-its-far-from-dead/ Wed, 22 May 2013 02:02:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: cooldoods http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/uspto-rejects-another-apple-patent-but-its-far-from-dead/#comment-1269239 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:16:05 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=596163#comment-1269239 It’s far from dead… until it’s dead lol

]]> By: saidimu apale http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/uspto-rejects-another-apple-patent-but-its-far-from-dead/#comment-1269160 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:12:33 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=596163#comment-1269160 The USPTO’s ruling, while not an invalidation, is far more serious than you make it out to be. The fact that it was signed by a “primary” examiner, among other things, points to this.

No one but Judge Lucy Koh knows the effect on the Apple-Samsung trial. On what basis do you claim it should have no immediate effect?

Here is a link to a brief but very knowledgeable analysis by someone (not me) on HackerNews: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4945449

]]>