<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PaaS not cheap enough? AppFog has a deal for you!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/paas-not-cheap-enough-appfog-has-a-deal-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/paas-not-cheap-enough-appfog-has-a-deal-for-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/paas-not-cheap-enough-appfog-has-a-deal-for-you/#comment-1269998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595947#comment-1269998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice spam post Gil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice spam post Gil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/19/paas-not-cheap-enough-appfog-has-a-deal-for-you/#comment-1269465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595947#comment-1269465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I think cost is the secondary issue.
If a certain platform can save me a lot of time and effort - I would go for it.
The bigger issue is the lack of flexibility. I want to be able to control everything (just if needed) - to choose versions, to use whatever network protocols I wish, to even install something kernel level if I need to (not common, but not that far-fetched). For this - we need something in the middle between IaaS and PaaS - keeping the ease of use of PaaS, while not killing the flexibility of IaaS (*only if needed*).

You can take a look at http://www.ravellosystems.com - our take on this is to let our users create customizable and cloud-agnostic blueprints (which support customization in the deepest levels possible, while also allowing duplicating applications).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think cost is the secondary issue.<br />
If a certain platform can save me a lot of time and effort &#8211; I would go for it.<br />
The bigger issue is the lack of flexibility. I want to be able to control everything (just if needed) &#8211; to choose versions, to use whatever network protocols I wish, to even install something kernel level if I need to (not common, but not that far-fetched). For this &#8211; we need something in the middle between IaaS and PaaS &#8211; keeping the ease of use of PaaS, while not killing the flexibility of IaaS (*only if needed*).</p>
<p>You can take a look at <a href="http://www.ravellosystems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ravellosystems.com</a> &#8211; our take on this is to let our users create customizable and cloud-agnostic blueprints (which support customization in the deepest levels possible, while also allowing duplicating applications).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
