7 Comments

Summary:

A consortium of European technology companies and universities wants to identify the technologies beyond 4G. Given a broad mandate, METIS is investigating everything from super-dense small cell deployments to virtualizing the radio network in the cloud. In 30 months we’ll see its first recommendations.

Carriers worldwide will begin their first small cell deployments next year with the aim of creating dense layers of 3G and 4G capacity. The end goal of these shrunken cells is to put massive amounts of bandwidth precisely where people are using it: malls, arenas, public plazas, urban parks and busy business districts.

But the first wave of small cells mounted on outdoor street poles and ceilings could just be the beginning. A consortium of technology companies and universities brought together by the European Commission is investigating a concept called the super-dense network, which could put multiple tiny cells in every room. We’re not just talking networks on the small scale, but on the human scale.

METIS logoThe consortium has the rather ungainly name of Mobile and wireless communications Enablers for the Twenty-twenty Information Society, but thankfully it’s using the moniker METIS for short. With the help of a €16 million (U.S. $21.2 million) grant for the European Union, METIS is tasked with identifying the network technologies beyond the LTE-Advanced standards being developed today.

These so-called 5G technologies could take the form of new radio air interfaces, new cellular architectures like heterogeneous networks and wide-area mobile mesh, and even the virtualization of the network itself, said Jan Färjh, Head of Standardization and Industry for Ericsson, the network vendor spearheading METIS. Färjh uses the word “could” because no one in consortium knows what form the network of 2020 and beyond will take. These new technologies are on the bleeding edge and it is METIS’ goal to determine which are technically and commercially feasible.

“We have to be prepared for the world 10 years after LTE and LTE-Advanced,” Färjh said. While vendors and the standards bodies have some good ideas about what the capabilities of our networks should be in 2020, Färjh said, it’s not obvious what those networks should look like.

Jan Färjh

Jan Färjh

To that end METIS is opening up multiple fields of investigation, digging into research projects in the labs of academic institutions like Aalborg University in Denmark and Poznan University of Technology in Poland. Though the big vendors and carriers like Alcatel-Lucent, Nokia and Telefónica are all there, Metis is also reaching beyond the traditional wireless industry to include companies like BMW. One of the big areas METIS will explore, Färjh said, is vehicle-to-vehicle networking; one day, cars won’t just be end-points in the network, they’ll be nodes within it.

Another field Färjh said METIS will delve into is the possibility of moving baseband processing to the cloud. Today’s radio access network (RAN) is all designed so that every base station processor can handle its cell’s peak load, but most cells are only at peak capacity for a small portion of the day. That’s a lot of processing power that’s just sitting idle throughout the network. Vendors like Intel have proposed moving those base stations into the cloud, creating a set of shared processing resources.

“What if we had a flexible architecture in which you can move around processing power to wherever its needed in the network,” Färjh said. “We could take the virtualization model and apply it to the mobile network.”

In addition to car-to-car connectivity, METIS will also look into making devices nodes in ad hoc networks, Färjh said. Instead of communicating directly with a tower, our phones and gadgets could relay their data between one another in a giant mesh, eventually offloading their data into the mobile network proper through the most efficient connection or combination of connections. These are concepts being explored by startup Open Garden and the open-source mesh-networking initiative Commotion.

Whether all or any of these technologies make it into METIS’s final set of recommendations 30 months from now is hard to predict, Färjh said. The technologies themselves might be viable on their own, but their practical implementation is another story. For instance, backhaul is very real obstacle to super-dense networking and Cloud-RAN, both of which would need to be plugged into huge transport pipes. We can’t just plan future networks. We have to plan the networks that will support those networks.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user higyou

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Excellent prospect and great article. Given the time estimated for an initial response and the speed of technological development, how flexible is METIS’ remit and scope?

    1. Thanks Joseph,

      I’m not sure if I follow your question exactly, but maybe the answer is in here somewhere: METIS just formed and right now its in the identification phase. From my understanding, it will first identify technologies it wants to investigate and assign groups to look into them. It’s scheduled to make it’s recommendations in 30 months. The idea, I believe, is to bring those recommendations to the standards bodies.

      1. Apologies – my question was whether METIS’ identification of technologies will be ongoing, or whether it will identify some and just report back on those. 30 months is a long time and within that period new technology could come along. Would METIS’ investigations evolve with technology?

        My hope would be that this is an ongoing project to continue sourcing cutting edge technology far beyond 30 months.

      2. Ah I see now. I did ask Jan that. He said METIS was funded for 30 months so that’s the current scope of its work. But he said the project could get refunded after that.

  2. Thanks Kevin. Looking forward to hear more!

  3. Priya Natarajan Friday, December 21, 2012

    Great article, Kevin. It is very true that we have to plan the networks for the future. Virtualization at both access and core are important.

  4. A device in every room transmitting data over the radio spectrum?

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t we pretty much already have this? Mine says Belkin on the side.

Comments have been disabled for this post