<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysalix VCs: Well, we&#8217;re making money in cleantech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/#comment-1287192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595388#comment-1287192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 70% UNREALIZED gain 4 years into a typical 10 year fund life does not represent &#039;making money&#039;!  But reporting it as such does indicate &#039;desperation&#039;.
A better indication of their ability to &#039;make money&#039; would be for them to share their REALIZED performance from their older 2 funds.....but I bet they won&#039;t......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 70% UNREALIZED gain 4 years into a typical 10 year fund life does not represent &#8216;making money&#8217;!  But reporting it as such does indicate &#8216;desperation&#8217;.<br />
A better indication of their ability to &#8216;make money&#8217; would be for them to share their REALIZED performance from their older 2 funds&#8230;..but I bet they won&#8217;t&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/#comment-1267203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cdog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595388#comment-1267203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their portfolio reads like the walking dead - likely propped up valuations with inside rounds. Micro fuel cells? Fusion? These are capital intensive companies that are not going to return their investments in this climate anytime soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their portfolio reads like the walking dead &#8211; likely propped up valuations with inside rounds. Micro fuel cells? Fusion? These are capital intensive companies that are not going to return their investments in this climate anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Hoenikker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/#comment-1266040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix Hoenikker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595388#comment-1266040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhhhh so they&#039;re not actually making money yet, the valuation of their portfolio companies rose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhhh so they&#8217;re not actually making money yet, the valuation of their portfolio companies rose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/18/chrysalix-vcs-well-were-making-money-in-cleantech/#comment-1265834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=595388#comment-1265834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugh, that &#039;cleantech is dead&#039; quote is dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, that &#8216;cleantech is dead&#8217; quote is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
