<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle&#8217;s planned fiber network: The gigabit is in the details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Flugstad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/#comment-1264354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Flugstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=594560#comment-1264354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am the CEO of a Seattle based ISP.  There are companies, like mine, that are already doing this exact model (Cascadelink, Atlas, CondoInternet)  Why didn&#039;t Seattle work with these companies to grow what they are already doing, rather than bringing in a out of state company?  I am happy to talk or answer any questions Stacey or anyone else might have.  Thanks
-Chris Flugstad, CEO Cascadelink]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the CEO of a Seattle based ISP.  There are companies, like mine, that are already doing this exact model (Cascadelink, Atlas, CondoInternet)  Why didn&#8217;t Seattle work with these companies to grow what they are already doing, rather than bringing in a out of state company?  I am happy to talk or answer any questions Stacey or anyone else might have.  Thanks<br />
-Chris Flugstad, CEO Cascadelink</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/#comment-1263463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=594560#comment-1263463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat7</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/#comment-1260728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=594560#comment-1260728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Leandro (www.litsanleandro.com) is also getting a fiber loop via a public private partnership with San Leandro Dark Fiber.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Leandro (www.litsanleandro.com) is also getting a fiber loop via a public private partnership with San Leandro Dark Fiber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reppond</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/14/seattles-planned-fiber-network-the-gigabit-is-in-the-details/#comment-1255672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Reppond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=594560#comment-1255672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m very curious of the anticipated coverage map that Gigabit Squared is planning on. Will it be the same for the Wi-Fi coverage?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very curious of the anticipated coverage map that Gigabit Squared is planning on. Will it be the same for the Wi-Fi coverage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
