<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft-Apple flap over App Store fees reportedly about Office for iOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azurati</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/#comment-1301672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azurati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593311#comment-1301672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dispute between Microsoft and Apple has serious consequences for App developers who publish &#039;free&#039; apps in the App Store, only to then charge users to activate the app or to upgrade to a version with better functionality.

As Microsoft seems to be at odds with Apple&#039;s stance that all in-app purchases should require a 30% payment to Apple (in perpetuity), will this force app developers to develop HTML5 web apps to by-pass app stores? 

This blog article looks at this in more detail: http://tinyurl.com/awgmapw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dispute between Microsoft and Apple has serious consequences for App developers who publish &#8216;free&#8217; apps in the App Store, only to then charge users to activate the app or to upgrade to a version with better functionality.</p>
<p>As Microsoft seems to be at odds with Apple&#8217;s stance that all in-app purchases should require a 30% payment to Apple (in perpetuity), will this force app developers to develop HTML5 web apps to by-pass app stores? </p>
<p>This blog article looks at this in more detail: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/awgmapw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/awgmapw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammu Market</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/#comment-1247638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ammu Market]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593311#comment-1247638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is in such an encouraging post, it is really great piece of data.
Thanks By
http://ammumarket.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in such an encouraging post, it is really great piece of data.<br />
Thanks By<br />
<a href="http://ammumarket.net" rel="nofollow">http://ammumarket.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Willis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/#comment-1247580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593311#comment-1247580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft should drop their own 30% cut for apps launched on their mobile and Windows 8 stores if they wish to make a good argument to not pay it to another vendor.  That said, I find Apple&#039;s 30% cut distasteful as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft should drop their own 30% cut for apps launched on their mobile and Windows 8 stores if they wish to make a good argument to not pay it to another vendor.  That said, I find Apple&#8217;s 30% cut distasteful as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greatartiststeals</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/#comment-1247519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greatartiststeals]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593311#comment-1247519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether Apple cares or not, MS Office is the defacto standard in the industry...if MSFT ultimately chooses not to bring MSFT to the iPad, it only makes the iPad less desirable to a large group of users who need Office.  As popular as the iPad is, the other pads will catch up and once they do, the 30% premium to be on the iPad becomes less appealing to the developer community...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Apple cares or not, MS Office is the defacto standard in the industry&#8230;if MSFT ultimately chooses not to bring MSFT to the iPad, it only makes the iPad less desirable to a large group of users who need Office.  As popular as the iPad is, the other pads will catch up and once they do, the 30% premium to be on the iPad becomes less appealing to the developer community&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Eagar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/microsoft-apple-flap-over-app-store-fees-reportedly-about-office-for-ios/#comment-1245904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Eagar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593311#comment-1245904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not 100% of all subscriptions pay Apple royalties. For example, I have several print magazine subscriptions that I have activated on iPad, and there are services like Dropbox which offer free apps and don&#039;t pay Apple a cut of the revenues they bring in from outside of iTunes. I can see how Microsoft would feel slighted. 

That said, there are already several decent iOS apps (some dating back to the original App Store debut in 2009) that allow creation and editing of documents in MS Office formats, so Apple probably doesn&#039;t feel too compelled to give Microsoft any relief here. Maybe if Microsoft were not so insanely late to the party, they might have some negotiating power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not 100% of all subscriptions pay Apple royalties. For example, I have several print magazine subscriptions that I have activated on iPad, and there are services like Dropbox which offer free apps and don&#8217;t pay Apple a cut of the revenues they bring in from outside of iTunes. I can see how Microsoft would feel slighted. </p>
<p>That said, there are already several decent iOS apps (some dating back to the original App Store debut in 2009) that allow creation and editing of documents in MS Office formats, so Apple probably doesn&#8217;t feel too compelled to give Microsoft any relief here. Maybe if Microsoft were not so insanely late to the party, they might have some negotiating power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>