<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BuzzFeed apologizes (sort of) for smear of The Oatmeal cartoonist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeby91</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1300059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joeby91]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1300059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my problem with this whole thing.

The article was bitter, biased and inaccurate. Welcome to the internet… welcome to 21st century media.

This is about popularity. Jack Stuef comes across very badly in the article as a nerd whose &#039;exposé&#039; is that this popular internet comedian is actually a JOCK *omg* and a BUSINESSMAN *horror* and a REPUBLICAN *faints*. In other words, he&#039;s not a nerd like you and me. He has a DOG. He has SEX. Jack Stuef fell victim to the idea that the internet is full of nerds in their mothers&#039; basements. People don&#039;t care. It was a lame effort to begin with.

The fact that it was filled with errors and poorly researched just gave Inman the ammunition he needed. If it had been true, it would have been harder to defend, and elements of what he wrote would have been very weak on their own. As it happens, Inman was right and he comes across not like an arrogant jock lording over a valiant nerd, but like an honourable guy being picked on by a twerp.

When that happens, accept you&#039;ve been stung and MOVE ON. Don&#039;t come back with a snide defence and stand by your own idiocy. Guys like Inman were more popular than Stuef in high school because they were decent guys… he&#039;s still a decent guy and Stuef is still a loser. You can&#039;t expect people to grow up when you&#039;re still acting like a socially retarded 14 year old…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my problem with this whole thing.</p>
<p>The article was bitter, biased and inaccurate. Welcome to the internet… welcome to 21st century media.</p>
<p>This is about popularity. Jack Stuef comes across very badly in the article as a nerd whose &#8216;exposé&#8217; is that this popular internet comedian is actually a JOCK *omg* and a BUSINESSMAN *horror* and a REPUBLICAN *faints*. In other words, he&#8217;s not a nerd like you and me. He has a DOG. He has SEX. Jack Stuef fell victim to the idea that the internet is full of nerds in their mothers&#8217; basements. People don&#8217;t care. It was a lame effort to begin with.</p>
<p>The fact that it was filled with errors and poorly researched just gave Inman the ammunition he needed. If it had been true, it would have been harder to defend, and elements of what he wrote would have been very weak on their own. As it happens, Inman was right and he comes across not like an arrogant jock lording over a valiant nerd, but like an honourable guy being picked on by a twerp.</p>
<p>When that happens, accept you&#8217;ve been stung and MOVE ON. Don&#8217;t come back with a snide defence and stand by your own idiocy. Guys like Inman were more popular than Stuef in high school because they were decent guys… he&#8217;s still a decent guy and Stuef is still a loser. You can&#8217;t expect people to grow up when you&#8217;re still acting like a socially retarded 14 year old…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hedgehog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1277326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hedgehog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1277326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story will only ever be accurate once it&#039;s removed. Funny junk learned earlier this year, and now BuzzFeed is going to learn, don&#039;t mess with The Oatmeal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story will only ever be accurate once it&#8217;s removed. Funny junk learned earlier this year, and now BuzzFeed is going to learn, don&#8217;t mess with The Oatmeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Papp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1258889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Papp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 01:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1258889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stupid is as stupid...says, in this case. moronical, too. The Oatmeal kicked the shit out of little (actually fat) Stuef.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stupid is as stupid&#8230;says, in this case. moronical, too. The Oatmeal kicked the shit out of little (actually fat) Stuef.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Collier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1248912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Collier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1248912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really is quite funny watching the liberal illiterati eat its own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is quite funny watching the liberal illiterati eat its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall G Arnold</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1248118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall G Arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1248118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think of the children!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of the children!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolores Grandes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1248058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolores Grandes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1248058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a regular reader of Wonkette I can attest that Jack Stuef while sometimes funny has shown a tendency for poor judgement in choosing his targets. This piece on The Oatmeal was just pointlessly mean-spirited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a regular reader of Wonkette I can attest that Jack Stuef while sometimes funny has shown a tendency for poor judgement in choosing his targets. This piece on The Oatmeal was just pointlessly mean-spirited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrJM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1247710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrJM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1247710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I think &#039;the oatmeal&#039; really got slammed.&quot;

You are correct. Unfortunately, that &quot;slam&quot; was based on falsehoods.

- MrJM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think &#8216;the oatmeal&#8217; really got slammed.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are correct. Unfortunately, that &#8220;slam&#8221; was based on falsehoods.</p>
<p>- MrJM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrJM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1247708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrJM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1247708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just feel terrible for Mr. Inman&#039;s children.

-- MrJM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just feel terrible for Mr. Inman&#8217;s children.</p>
<p>&#8211; MrJM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1246095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Q]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1246095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The peanuts of CPM journalism aren&#039;t enough to do proper fact checking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The peanuts of CPM journalism aren&#8217;t enough to do proper fact checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Butch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/11/buzzfeed-apologizes-sort-of-for-smear-of-the-oatmeal-cartoonist/#comment-1245236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Butch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=593001#comment-1245236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insightful? Beyond &quot;some&quot; false claims? Really? Sounds like the whole original Buzzfeed article was entirely false.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful? Beyond &#8220;some&#8221; false claims? Really? Sounds like the whole original Buzzfeed article was entirely false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
