<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoundCloud&#8217;s size does matter, but it&#8217;s not the only metric to watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Smith</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/#comment-1240826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winston Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590782#comment-1240826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[delete &amp; migrate...soundcloud killed the music.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>delete &amp; migrate&#8230;soundcloud killed the music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #t3xradiomag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/#comment-1228742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[#t3xradiomag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590782#comment-1228742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always felt that SC was not nearly fan friendly enough to justify the promo part of their pitch. Being a part of the promo experience I came to realize that it seems as though there were far more music creators than music consumers, and in my opinion, this reason alone is enough to discourage a sizable chunk of producers and indie artists from becoming premium members. 

Fortunately, the SC ecosystem did in fact provide an environment for some amazing apps (http://mycloudplayers.com - for one) to emerge, which compensate for some of the logical and marketing failings of SC itself.

I find the &quot;next SoundCloud&quot; to be just as dull and esoteric as it always has been. The only feature which I am actually glad to see is &quot;Repost&quot;. Now, at least it would be theoretically imaginable for a track to go viral within SC itself. We&#039;ll wait and see I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always felt that SC was not nearly fan friendly enough to justify the promo part of their pitch. Being a part of the promo experience I came to realize that it seems as though there were far more music creators than music consumers, and in my opinion, this reason alone is enough to discourage a sizable chunk of producers and indie artists from becoming premium members. </p>
<p>Fortunately, the SC ecosystem did in fact provide an environment for some amazing apps (<a href="http://mycloudplayers.com" rel="nofollow">http://mycloudplayers.com</a> &#8211; for one) to emerge, which compensate for some of the logical and marketing failings of SC itself.</p>
<p>I find the &#8220;next SoundCloud&#8221; to be just as dull and esoteric as it always has been. The only feature which I am actually glad to see is &#8220;Repost&#8221;. Now, at least it would be theoretically imaginable for a track to go viral within SC itself. We&#8217;ll wait and see I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Linabury</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/#comment-1228245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Linabury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590782#comment-1228245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to disagree with you, Steven. I am also a pro user and I&#039;ve always felt that the track listing approach was old school. It&#039;s what made MySpace&#039;s music player terrible. People have short attention spans now, so if they get through one entire track—and repost it—that&#039;s a win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you, Steven. I am also a pro user and I&#8217;ve always felt that the track listing approach was old school. It&#8217;s what made MySpace&#8217;s music player terrible. People have short attention spans now, so if they get through one entire track—and repost it—that&#8217;s a win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/#comment-1228240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Observer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590782#comment-1228240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Soundcloud.  Shame to hear about Steven&#039;s experience in the other comment and maybe this will be the downside for them in terms of paying customers.  The quote from Wahlforss &quot;We’re basically accepting any kind of user – it’s a broadening out.” may well sum it up.  But if they are going for scale then they obviously have the technical backing to get there.  I read somewhere that there is 10 hours of audio uploaded every minute.  You have to have the infrastructure or arrangements in place to deal with the changing demands ( http://ow.ly/fOA2c ).  Let&#039;s just hope that the changes don&#039;t drive off the paying subscribers like Steven or it might become another good idea which doesn&#039;t have the legs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Soundcloud.  Shame to hear about Steven&#8217;s experience in the other comment and maybe this will be the downside for them in terms of paying customers.  The quote from Wahlforss &#8220;We’re basically accepting any kind of user – it’s a broadening out.” may well sum it up.  But if they are going for scale then they obviously have the technical backing to get there.  I read somewhere that there is 10 hours of audio uploaded every minute.  You have to have the infrastructure or arrangements in place to deal with the changing demands ( <a href="http://ow.ly/fOA2c" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/fOA2c</a> ).  Let&#8217;s just hope that the changes don&#8217;t drive off the paying subscribers like Steven or it might become another good idea which doesn&#8217;t have the legs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/04/soundclouds-size-does-matter-but-its-not-the-only-metric-to-watch/#comment-1227938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven O'Brien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590782#comment-1227938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who pays for a premium account on Soundcloud and depends on it to run a business, this is a disaster. The new design is a nightmare. I certainly don&#039;t want to do it, but I&#039;ll be canceling my subscription and moving onto another service if serious issues aren&#039;t addressed.

Why on Earth would they think it was be a good idea to remove the &quot;list of tracks&quot; from sets? What about completely limiting and breaking the spotlight on the front of my profile page (the one that I paid for...), meaning that potential clients, instead of seeing my most successful and popular tracks, will now see some confusing nonsensical sets without tracklists and those pieces I dashed off in 5 minutes last night. This is ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who pays for a premium account on Soundcloud and depends on it to run a business, this is a disaster. The new design is a nightmare. I certainly don&#8217;t want to do it, but I&#8217;ll be canceling my subscription and moving onto another service if serious issues aren&#8217;t addressed.</p>
<p>Why on Earth would they think it was be a good idea to remove the &#8220;list of tracks&#8221; from sets? What about completely limiting and breaking the spotlight on the front of my profile page (the one that I paid for&#8230;), meaning that potential clients, instead of seeing my most successful and popular tracks, will now see some confusing nonsensical sets without tracklists and those pieces I dashed off in 5 minutes last night. This is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
