<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The demise of yet another thin film solar maker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/12/02/the-demise-of-yet-another-thin-film-solar-maker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/02/the-demise-of-yet-another-thin-film-solar-maker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/02/the-demise-of-yet-another-thin-film-solar-maker/#comment-1224580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CDF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=590228#comment-1224580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though a great product, solar shingles and other new solar products aren&#039;t cost effective. Large companies such as Hemlock Simiconductor have large investments in making large format solar cheaper, particularly for commercial uses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though a great product, solar shingles and other new solar products aren&#8217;t cost effective. Large companies such as Hemlock Simiconductor have large investments in making large format solar cheaper, particularly for commercial uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
