http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/ Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1260478 Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:29:44 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1260478 Margie, huh? You don’t think a hair stylist cares if her phone dies after a half-day of use? I think everyone cares about battery life. Phones are only useful if they’re on

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1259392 Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:18:31 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1259392 this is all well and good but the average, say, hair stylist in New York whose searching the internet for styles to try doesn’t care if her 4GLTE is eating up her battery, only that it’s fast. If they all die early, you’re back to a level playing field. Nothing AT&t or anyone else can do about it.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1231276 Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:33:40 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1231276 Dose it means , both VoLTE and CS fallback are needed by a platform ? When system detected no data transforing is on going , voice call fallback to 3/2G …when data tragic is needed , system keep it , and make the voice call via VoLTE

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1219745 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:45:33 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1219745 In order to make the test a fair efficiency comparison between the 2G and LTE voice over IP, the audio bandwidth should be equalized. VOIP audio bandwidth is often advertised as “CD” quality. A 10 min. call with the audio bandwidth extended down to 100hz or lower will use a lot more power.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1219104 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:31:07 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1219104 This data seems to be little bit inaccurate. I have practically used both CDMA and VoLTE phones. My observation was that fully charged CDMA phone was drained in 10 hours of active call and VoLTE phone drained with 8.5 hours of continuous call.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1219026 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:04:04 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1219026 Frand

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1218752 Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:44:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1218752 lol.. so true .. and so is GSM as well..

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1218498 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:10:00 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1218498 How could that be, it’s an LG phone.

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1218045 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:05:42 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1218045 This is SOOO wrong. VOLTE properly implemented should consume 50% less battery than 2G voice. This is a crappy head-over-heels 1st generation Samsung implementation running the entire protocol stack and voice processing in the application processor…

]]> http://gigaom.com/2012/11/28/volte-calls-consumer-twice-the-power-of-2g-voice-calls/#comment-1217893 Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:50:01 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=588901#comment-1217893 Reblogged this on MisterDTV and commented:
So, wondered why that new phone goes dead quicker than the old one. Maybe it is NOT the added browsing time!

]]>