14 Comments

Summary:

The Department of Energy’s grant program ARPA-E has chosen 66 more projects to fund, from printed batteries, to smart grid analytics to a Valley battery startup. Here’s some I think are particularly interesting.

beets

The Department of Energy’s high-risk early stage grant program, ARPA-E, has announced 66 new energy-related projects that will get small amounts of funding and mentorship from the DOE. ARPA-E said that it will give 66 groups — from universities, to startups, to government labs to large companies — a combined $130 million through its Open 2012 program to help them with cutting edge innovation around cleaner and more efficient transportation as well as energy generation and consumption.

The ARPA-E program is one of the DOE’s lauded programs, which has managed to gain bipartisan support and avoid controversy. In contrast, the DOE’s loan guarantee program and battery grant programs allocated large funds to single companies, and when a few of those companies went bankrupt, the DOE received significant criticism.

The ARPA-E program, on the other hand, only gives grants of small — hundreds of thousands to single digit millions — amounts and doesn’t expect to get a return back. It’s funding for basic scientific research. The program also backs so-called “moonshots,” which are innovations that could be transformational, but are at a very early stage — a very small amount of these technologies will probably ever be commercialized. The folks at ARPA-E now say they’ve backed 285 projects for a total of about $770 million in funding.

There were fewer startups in the mix than I’ve seen in recent years. It’s a lot harder to be an entrepreneur in this space these days. Some of the more interesting sounding projects in this crop include:

  • Energy beets: Say wha? A company called Plant Sensory Systems, has received a $1.8 million grant to engineer a beet with enhanced energy density that can be turned into biofuels, and which can also be grown with less water and fertilizer.
  • Waste natural gas to fuel: A company called Ceramatec was granted $1.7 million to build a reactor that can convert natural gas unearthed at remote oil field sites into fuel in one step. This natural gas is usually flared off and wasted.
  • Smart window coatings: Lawrence Berkeley National Labs will use a $3 million grant to low cost coatings for windows that will control light and heat.
  • Portable building mapping tech: LBNL received another grant, this one for $1.9 million, to make a device that senses and maps the internal and thermal characteristics for a building. Using this technology, you can see where heat loss is occurring. Sounds like Essess.
  • Cool roofs: Stanford University is looking to develop a low cost coating for roofs, buildings and cars that reflects sunlight and enables passive cooling. ARPA-E gave Stanford $400,000 to build the tech.
  • Smart grid security modelling: The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign received a $1.5 million grant to create a modelling and analysis tools to make the smart grid more secure.
  • Gas-based tech for high voltage power lines: The traditional way to control electricity over high voltage transmission lines is using silicon-based switches. GE’s Global Research division received a $4.1 million grant to work on a gas-based switch that can lower the cost of transmission lines, improve grid reliability, and help with clean power deployment.
  • Super wires: A startup called Grid Logic is working on low cost and high temperature superconducting wires. ARPA-E gave the company a $3.8 million grant.
  • Transmission line analytics: Pacific Northwest National Labs received a $1.6 million grant to develop analytics to find unused space on transmission lines and increase efficiency of the use of transmission lines by 30 percent.
  • Big data grid collection: The University of California, Berkeley, along with the California Institute for Energy and Environment, have received $4 million to develop “micro” synchrophasors to collect real time grid data. Are these even smaller versions of the synchrophasors out there? Not sure, I’ll do some research on it.
  • Water wing: Brown University will work on an “oscillating underwater wing” that can capture energy from flowing water in rivers and tides. They’ll control it with software. I feel like a lot of companies who make these design really nice ones, but the problem is in making sure it lasts years while being battered by water and the elements. Brown received $750,000 for this project.
  • Fabric wind blades: GE has quite a few projects in here. Another one is a project to create wind blades made out of fabric stretched across a frame. GE says such blades could enable wind turbines to be “manufactured in sections and assembled on-site, enabling the construction of much larger wind turbines with higher efficiency and lower cost.”
  • Energy from dust devils: Here’s a weird one (for @go2cleanbreak’s book). The Georgia Institute for Technology wants to use a $3.7 million grant to capture energy from wind vortices by harvesting a thin layer of hot air along the ground created by the sun. Like a manufactured, controlled dust devil. I don’t know what to say about that one.
  • Mini mirror solar field: San Francisco’s own Otherlab is working on developing solar projects with small mirrors that will focus light onto towers. Usually these types of fields (like Ivanpah) use large mirrors.
  • New Valley battery startup?: A startup called Alveo Energy won a $4 million grant for a battery for grid storage that will use Prussian Blue dye as the active material in the battery. They were founded in 2012, based in Palo Alto and their CEO is Colin Wessells, according to Google searches (they don’t have a website). If anyone knows more about this company, ping me.
  • Magnetic energy storage: Here’s a new one. The Tai Yang Research Company wants to create a device that stores energy in superconducting cables, by increasing magnetic field strength of the cable.
  • Solar fuel: The Georgia Institute of Technology received $3.6 million to build a solar reactor to produce solar fuel. Sounds like what Joule has been working on … by the way, whatever happened to them?
  • Printed batteries: The Palo Alto Research Center got close to a million dollars to develop printing technology for lithium ion batteries

Image courtesy of Peyri, and rosmary.

  1. How many of these companies are doing pure R&D – without a need to make a profit?

    The problem with government venture capital is the fear of failure. To mitigate risk, the government spends money on diligence before the award and management after the award. the paperwork is a joke by the way. Real VCs put their money to work (with the entrepreneurs) and take their chances on a few home runs. When a DoE company fails, it’s front page news #Solyndra. ero the fallacy of this approach.

    The government “should” be funding pure R&D, typically this is done in Universities or public companies that don’t have a profit-or-founder business model.

    Share
  2. These awards are fricken joke – no solid business case and most to universities with no business success, giant companies like GE who are the last people who need cash and vc startups most of which have no proven energy savings or generation at acceptable scale. We were rejected despite a proven technology where we can polymerize with no energy thus allowing by example the elimination if almost all energy in automotive painting and composites manufacture, thus also enabling new less expensive lightweighting materials. We have 500 billion plus in revenue companies behind us with a diverse partnership. Clearly utterly political. The list is laughable and belies a deep inexperience of those selecting the programs.

    Share
  3. Firstly, I think the author did a great job providing a glimpse into the enormous amount of odds and ends that need to be arranged in order to have a truly effective ‘energy’ environment. In identifying the components, the process can begin to be methodologically resolved to work. It is a privilege/pleasure to have disclosure regarding what the government is participating in to the effect of a smarter and more efficient world.
    It would be best if there is an effort to produce things as non toxically and anti carcinogenic as possible. Lots of energy is useless if everyone has cancer.

    Share
  4. I can’t believe EESTor is ahead of schedule, so close, microns close, but ARPA is not funding EESCAM, hehehe.

    Share
  5. That is pure “green painted” energy, it does not solve the US energy needs, but keeps some connected companies happy, and ready to return the favor…they are simply wasting the money.

    Share
  6. One would think arpa-e would bother to run some type of baseline analysis on potential effect of what they invest in. Small mirrors? Really? Hmmm…solar power density is still crap whether you use Pv bIg mirrors or small mirrors. The dust devil totally unproven, already been tried multiple timesand failed, and by the inventors own words will not significant increase per m^2 output.

    Arpa-e is no DARPA. Frigging joke.

    Share
    1. Wilmot McCutchen Saturday, December 22, 2012

      There should be a way for such considerations to be discussed with input from the public before ARPA-E commits money to unscalable projects. DOE needs a database of technology assessment too, as the GAO insists. Re the dust devil, how about the Atmospheric Vortex Engine of Louis Michaud? http://www.powermag.com/issues/features/Harnessing-Energy-from-Upward-Heat-Convection_2511.html

      Share
  7. How do we get the DOT/DOE and dept. of HIGHWAYS to acknowledge our attempt to open a conversation about a new concept to save our current system of driving on streets and highways while improving our entire system of National transportation.with a minimum of cost and disruption. BIMODAL GLIDEWAYS, is a proposed concept for a pattern of a practical solution for all current transportation problems. If the DOT and all entrepreneurs would seriously consider BMG potential they will be suprised at the enormous benefits to the entire US, economically, physically, internationally, while saving our current system and improving all other forms of transportation, ie: air, truck, bus, auto., rails, shipping, etc. Please see our net pages. “bimodalglideway.com” . Thanks, Bill Davis

    Share
  8. How do we get the DOT/DOE and dept. of HIGHWAYS to acknowledge our attempt to open a conversation about a new concept to save our current system of driving on streets and highways while improving our entire system of National transportation.with a minimum of cost and disruption. BIMODAL GLIDEWAYS, is a proposed concept for a pattern of a practical solution for all current transportation problems. If the DOT and all entrepreneurs would seriously consider BMG potential they will be suprised at the enormous benefits to the entire US, economically, physically, internationally, while saving our current system and improving all other forms of transportation, ie: air, truck, bus, auto., rails, shipping, etc. Please see our net pages. “bimodalglideway.com” . Thanks, Bill Davis

    Share
  9. If one of the ways to replace fossil fuel is electric vehicle , we really need to anticipate a gradual more use of electric power and thus the grid. On 2011 days before clean energy in Austin Texas ,the Texas grid failed after couple of hot days. In California the marginal grid had power company to encourage home owner to use some appliances during night time. This requires us to upgrade our grids and ways to efficiency and creation of new ways in energy creation. About half of energy consumption goes for heating and cooling a house. There are ways to reduce this energy consumption . Please visit http://www.cgitechnology.net
    I have posed a question to some people in ARPA E organization . Are rats more green than human. The rats live in crawl space during hot summer time and live in attic space during winter time. This fact made me to come up with the thermal conducting time delay concept ( changing days temperature to nights and vice versa).

    Share
  10. Apparently, the publication of an article on 2013 prospectives in Ethanol Producer Magazine was right on the money, refering to the much greater need for biomass to have a greater recognition in value. The mere fact that higher corn prices will drive innovation, may ultimately take its toll as ethanol producers realize that the raw input costs for biomass are actually lower. My project, although ignored in this instance, has caught the attention of some at the DOE. There’s more work that needs to be done, but without funding it would be like an Ant pushing an Elephant.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post