<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don’t overspend on new guitar amps: get these 2 great Mac apps instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/11/24/we-are-the-champions-two-great-guitar-amp-programs-for-the-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/24/we-are-the-champions-two-great-guitar-amp-programs-for-the-mac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin L. Franks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/24/we-are-the-champions-two-great-guitar-amp-programs-for-the-mac/#comment-1312533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin L. Franks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=586539#comment-1312533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is definitely a very large bias against anything without tubes, and especially against modeling. 10 years ago, or even just a couple of years ago, amp modeling was definitely inferior. But the most modern amp modeling software really is incredible, and only people with the very most discriminating ears can reliably tell the difference in a blind test.

The amount of detail, dynamics, and quality of tone of amp modeling software is stunning, and the fact that you can own accurate models of amps which you could never afford for less than the cost of an entry-level tube amp makes it even sweeter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is definitely a very large bias against anything without tubes, and especially against modeling. 10 years ago, or even just a couple of years ago, amp modeling was definitely inferior. But the most modern amp modeling software really is incredible, and only people with the very most discriminating ears can reliably tell the difference in a blind test.</p>
<p>The amount of detail, dynamics, and quality of tone of amp modeling software is stunning, and the fact that you can own accurate models of amps which you could never afford for less than the cost of an entry-level tube amp makes it even sweeter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/24/we-are-the-champions-two-great-guitar-amp-programs-for-the-mac/#comment-1310250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=586539#comment-1310250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the impression that every guitar player feels that a good tube amp is what they most want to play through, and no modeling program - and definitely no solid-state amp or stomp box - is as good as tubes. The only downside is the cost and maintenance of tube amps. Would you agree?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the impression that every guitar player feels that a good tube amp is what they most want to play through, and no modeling program &#8211; and definitely no solid-state amp or stomp box &#8211; is as good as tubes. The only downside is the cost and maintenance of tube amps. Would you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels Erik Frederiksen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/24/we-are-the-champions-two-great-guitar-amp-programs-for-the-mac/#comment-1310235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niels Erik Frederiksen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=586539#comment-1310235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article. Do you know if it&#039;s possible to create a separate Aggregate input in Apple’s Audio Midi setup or something similar on an iPad? I would like to do the same as you with my amplifier and/or Roland Midi Piano.
Best regards
Niels Erik]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Do you know if it&#8217;s possible to create a separate Aggregate input in Apple’s Audio Midi setup or something similar on an iPad? I would like to do the same as you with my amplifier and/or Roland Midi Piano.<br />
Best regards<br />
Niels Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
