<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KiOR hits milestone of making biocrude in Mississippi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/11/12/kior-hits-milestone-of-making-biocrude-in-mississippi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/12/kior-hits-milestone-of-making-biocrude-in-mississippi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gekko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/12/kior-hits-milestone-of-making-biocrude-in-mississippi/#comment-1300394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gekko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=583474#comment-1300394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, you are definitely right. Catalyst life, cost are critical for the commercialization of catalytic pyrolysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, you are definitely right. Catalyst life, cost are critical for the commercialization of catalytic pyrolysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rudesill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/12/kior-hits-milestone-of-making-biocrude-in-mississippi/#comment-1206479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Rudesill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=583474#comment-1206479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is encouraging progress.  I still wonder how their catalyst will survive the highly alkaline ash left after the biomass has volatized off.  The KiOR process is very similar to the petroleum refining process Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) where catalyst consumption is a 0.1-0.5 lbs/bbl of feed.  A &quot;barrel&quot; of biomass say 350 lbs will contain 5-25 lbs of ash which will likely adhere and fuse to the catalyst rapidly deactivating it.  KiOR is circumspect about catalyst life, cost, and supply.  I would be too if my process had 0.3 lbs of catalyst swamped by 5-25 lbs of alkaline ash!  Looks like the real money will be in the catalyst supply!  Not surprising given that the founders come from the fluid cracking catalyst world as do I.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is encouraging progress.  I still wonder how their catalyst will survive the highly alkaline ash left after the biomass has volatized off.  The KiOR process is very similar to the petroleum refining process Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) where catalyst consumption is a 0.1-0.5 lbs/bbl of feed.  A &#8220;barrel&#8221; of biomass say 350 lbs will contain 5-25 lbs of ash which will likely adhere and fuse to the catalyst rapidly deactivating it.  KiOR is circumspect about catalyst life, cost, and supply.  I would be too if my process had 0.3 lbs of catalyst swamped by 5-25 lbs of alkaline ash!  Looks like the real money will be in the catalyst supply!  Not surprising given that the founders come from the fluid cracking catalyst world as do I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
