<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cleantech sector dodges a bullet as Obama projected to take Presidency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/11/06/the-cleantech-sector-dodges-a-bullet-as-obama-projected-to-take-presidency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/06/the-cleantech-sector-dodges-a-bullet-as-obama-projected-to-take-presidency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Taylor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/06/the-cleantech-sector-dodges-a-bullet-as-obama-projected-to-take-presidency/#comment-1154623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=581599#comment-1154623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was quite a surprise when Romney was so critical of clean tech. I recognize that he was trying to appeal to oil and coal supporters, but it seems like that audience would be much smaller than those who see clean tech as our future (for employment and true energy independence). Maybe it was a play for conservative voters, but for whatever reason, it wasn&#039;t a wise choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was quite a surprise when Romney was so critical of clean tech. I recognize that he was trying to appeal to oil and coal supporters, but it seems like that audience would be much smaller than those who see clean tech as our future (for employment and true energy independence). Maybe it was a play for conservative voters, but for whatever reason, it wasn&#8217;t a wise choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
