<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skeuomorphism is (finally) dead: So what is Apple&#8217;s next design move?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlacrem</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1223753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dlacrem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1223753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seriously, claiming skeuomorphism is dead just because Scott Forstall is a mediocre designer seems like overreaching. It&#039;s like trying to nail down his mediocrity to a decision he made instead of being completely blunt.

The problem with iCal isn&#039;t the stitched leather, it&#039;s the fact that the buttons look ugly, the white space is wrong, the colors are bland, the layout design is lazy, and that there is no consistency in the design at all.

Go to dribble, search UI or app and find some examples of perfectly designed skeuomorphic designs, with good fonts, good white space, good colors, good buttons and elements and good readability and space optimization, and then tell me how blaming it on skeuomorphism instead of blaming it on Scott Forstall is the way to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, claiming skeuomorphism is dead just because Scott Forstall is a mediocre designer seems like overreaching. It&#8217;s like trying to nail down his mediocrity to a decision he made instead of being completely blunt.</p>
<p>The problem with iCal isn&#8217;t the stitched leather, it&#8217;s the fact that the buttons look ugly, the white space is wrong, the colors are bland, the layout design is lazy, and that there is no consistency in the design at all.</p>
<p>Go to dribble, search UI or app and find some examples of perfectly designed skeuomorphic designs, with good fonts, good white space, good colors, good buttons and elements and good readability and space optimization, and then tell me how blaming it on skeuomorphism instead of blaming it on Scott Forstall is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Lee Abrams</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1207211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Lee Abrams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 03:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1207211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Gary Boodhoo, the voice of daylight in a storm of nonsense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Gary Boodhoo, the voice of daylight in a storm of nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Boodhoo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1206725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Boodhoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1206725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a directory of eBooks is literally a pattern of switches in on/off combinations. End of story. That you call them &quot;eBooks&quot; at all reveals a necessary level of visual and mental abstraction that you describe as &quot;ridiculous&quot; and yet very clearly is not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a directory of eBooks is literally a pattern of switches in on/off combinations. End of story. That you call them &#8220;eBooks&#8221; at all reveals a necessary level of visual and mental abstraction that you describe as &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; and yet very clearly is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Boodhoo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1206720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Boodhoo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1206720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are you seriously comparing Windows XP to an iPad? Missing your point entirely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you seriously comparing Windows XP to an iPad? Missing your point entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce D. Jenner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1201727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce D. Jenner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1201727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skeuomorphism is ridiculous and hopefully will now die a quick and painful death. It takes up space better used for other things like data, and looks cheesy and childish.

A directory of eBooks IS NOT a bookshelf, and should not be treated or portrayed as one. Not to mention that almost anyone under 30, wouldn&#039;t recognize half the objects as what they&#039;re supposed to be anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeuomorphism is ridiculous and hopefully will now die a quick and painful death. It takes up space better used for other things like data, and looks cheesy and childish.</p>
<p>A directory of eBooks IS NOT a bookshelf, and should not be treated or portrayed as one. Not to mention that almost anyone under 30, wouldn&#8217;t recognize half the objects as what they&#8217;re supposed to be anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASAV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1148857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ASAV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1148857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People were asking where the profit would be in a touchscreen device before the iPhone also.  Turns out, it was there, people just hadn&#039;t had a reason to spend money on it before.  If you add value, people will pay more for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People were asking where the profit would be in a touchscreen device before the iPhone also.  Turns out, it was there, people just hadn&#8217;t had a reason to spend money on it before.  If you add value, people will pay more for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kheba</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1147523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kheba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1147523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely disagree with you mate .. I&#039;ve a non-touch ultrabook and I can work on Win 8 as fast as with previous versions of Windows .. In fact I think Win 8 increases productivity in some areas .. agree there&#039;s a bit of a learning curve .. half an hour for me .. but I&#039;m loving it ..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree with you mate .. I&#8217;ve a non-touch ultrabook and I can work on Win 8 as fast as with previous versions of Windows .. In fact I think Win 8 increases productivity in some areas .. agree there&#8217;s a bit of a learning curve .. half an hour for me .. but I&#8217;m loving it ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1147337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1147337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Microsoft Windows 8 is well suited to touch screens but feels alien when using it on a standard desktop or laptop. I cant see how the interface will work with business customers !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Microsoft Windows 8 is well suited to touch screens but feels alien when using it on a standard desktop or laptop. I cant see how the interface will work with business customers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Lee Abrams</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1146859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Lee Abrams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 06:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1146859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of this is utter nonsense; there seems to be a profound confusion of various different aspects of design, usability, technical development, aesthetics, and other issues universally related to capitalist economics and the realities of the market place. The discussion shows also a profound ignorance of the history of computers and computing, and the (for the most part) resolved issues surrounding the democratization of computing to include the otherwise illiterate and those with physical challenges. 

There is nowhere a recognition of the relationship between the underlying logical architecture of a &quot;computer&quot;, the chosen operating system, and the possibilities and limitations of a &quot;user interface&quot; with the machine. Perhaps Steve Jobs&#039; most unique and revolutionary ability was his deep understanding that he was taking the most complex and complicated machines ever developed and making them easy to use and accessible to everyone, limited, if at all, more by economic reasons than by lack of a highly technical education. And...he was designing machines which would eventually be used by other people who did not themselves design them or have the slightest idea how they worked, nor would they ever need to know.  

One need not ever have touched the screen of a Windows 8 machine to know that underneath its &#039;modern interface&#039; (modern in exactly the way &#039;modern art&#039; might be different from earlier art) of colorful tiles lay a &quot;menu system&quot; of some kind that is a graphical representation of the hierarchical operating system at the heart of an information machine. 

Unless one does not ever intend to use a keyboard, it seems to me them only bit of separate &quot;hardware&quot; apparently eliminated by a touchscreen is a mouse. How long will it be before every Windows 8 user is clamoring for a peripheral &#039;mouse device&#039; compatible with his or her new &quot;touchscreen&quot; computer? 

Perhaps the greatest thing lost to the world with the passing of Steve Jobs was someone strong enough to say &#039;no&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of this is utter nonsense; there seems to be a profound confusion of various different aspects of design, usability, technical development, aesthetics, and other issues universally related to capitalist economics and the realities of the market place. The discussion shows also a profound ignorance of the history of computers and computing, and the (for the most part) resolved issues surrounding the democratization of computing to include the otherwise illiterate and those with physical challenges. </p>
<p>There is nowhere a recognition of the relationship between the underlying logical architecture of a &#8220;computer&#8221;, the chosen operating system, and the possibilities and limitations of a &#8220;user interface&#8221; with the machine. Perhaps Steve Jobs&#8217; most unique and revolutionary ability was his deep understanding that he was taking the most complex and complicated machines ever developed and making them easy to use and accessible to everyone, limited, if at all, more by economic reasons than by lack of a highly technical education. And&#8230;he was designing machines which would eventually be used by other people who did not themselves design them or have the slightest idea how they worked, nor would they ever need to know.  </p>
<p>One need not ever have touched the screen of a Windows 8 machine to know that underneath its &#8216;modern interface&#8217; (modern in exactly the way &#8216;modern art&#8217; might be different from earlier art) of colorful tiles lay a &#8220;menu system&#8221; of some kind that is a graphical representation of the hierarchical operating system at the heart of an information machine. </p>
<p>Unless one does not ever intend to use a keyboard, it seems to me them only bit of separate &#8220;hardware&#8221; apparently eliminated by a touchscreen is a mouse. How long will it be before every Windows 8 user is clamoring for a peripheral &#8216;mouse device&#8217; compatible with his or her new &#8220;touchscreen&#8221; computer? </p>
<p>Perhaps the greatest thing lost to the world with the passing of Steve Jobs was someone strong enough to say &#8216;no&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orthorim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/11/03/skeumorphism-is-finally-dead-so-what-is-apples-next-design-move/#comment-1146718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orthorim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=580048#comment-1146718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Replacing hardware is the whole purpose of the touchscreen. The touchscreen has a million buttons so that the hardware can have almost zero buttons.&quot;

Ah, yes. I am partial to skeumorphism but that&#039;s actually a really good logical reason for it. I am sure Steve Jobs saw it the same way. 

I don&#039;t get the love affair some internet designers seem to have with Windows Metro either - it&#039;s &quot;clean&quot;, until you try to do something and find that all the functionality is hidden behind similar looking tiles. Whereas iOS is so direct, so obvious - well exactly. That&#039;s the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Replacing hardware is the whole purpose of the touchscreen. The touchscreen has a million buttons so that the hardware can have almost zero buttons.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, yes. I am partial to skeumorphism but that&#8217;s actually a really good logical reason for it. I am sure Steve Jobs saw it the same way. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get the love affair some internet designers seem to have with Windows Metro either &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;clean&#8221;, until you try to do something and find that all the functionality is hidden behind similar looking tiles. Whereas iOS is so direct, so obvious &#8211; well exactly. That&#8217;s the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
