<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s new iPod touch takes a step back: No light sensor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaTasha W.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1282309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaTasha W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1282309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auto brightness.....ehh, I can take it or leave it, but I did want the percentage status for the battery to be there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The auto brightness&#8230;..ehh, I can take it or leave it, but I did want the percentage status for the battery to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiyoon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1194941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiyoon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1194941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed it today. I&#039;m very upset and disappointed.
This is not a little thing for me. It was really important function for me.

How can they take a step back and charge more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed it today. I&#8217;m very upset and disappointed.<br />
This is not a little thing for me. It was really important function for me.</p>
<p>How can they take a step back and charge more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inanis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1190487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inanis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1190487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i use my ipod mostly for music and reading .. the auto brigthness is a must have for me.. so im keeping  my ipod 4.

ill get the ipod 6g .. mebe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use my ipod mostly for music and reading .. the auto brigthness is a must have for me.. so im keeping  my ipod 4.</p>
<p>ill get the ipod 6g .. mebe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1122174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1122174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your life must be so hard, you have to go all the way to the settings menu to change your brightness :( wow, your ridiculous. simply place you hand over the ipod to cover the screen so you can see outside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your life must be so hard, you have to go all the way to the settings menu to change your brightness :( wow, your ridiculous. simply place you hand over the ipod to cover the screen so you can see outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GatorRay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1100769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GatorRay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1100769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a 3rd gen iTouch. It has an auto light sensor but it doesn&#039;t seem to work consistently. The new 5th gen shows a sensor of some sort on the rear upper right but I don&#039;t know what it is. Maybe it&#039;s only the external cover glass for the auto sensor that is left over from earlier generations  but is  non-functional in the 5th? Am correct? Am I lookin at the rear of the 5th and not the 4th????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 3rd gen iTouch. It has an auto light sensor but it doesn&#8217;t seem to work consistently. The new 5th gen shows a sensor of some sort on the rear upper right but I don&#8217;t know what it is. Maybe it&#8217;s only the external cover glass for the auto sensor that is left over from earlier generations  but is  non-functional in the 5th? Am correct? Am I lookin at the rear of the 5th and not the 4th????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1085756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1085756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t you embarrassed to complain about such a thing?  Techies invent problems because their lives are meaningless and boring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you embarrassed to complain about such a thing?  Techies invent problems because their lives are meaningless and boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trip1ex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1084548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trip1ex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1084548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did I call it or what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I call it or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1083483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1083483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a &#039;hack&#039; (that does NOT require jailbreaking) to enable the battery percentage in the status bar. It was the first thing I did with my new iPod touch. If only the lack of an ambient light sensor problem was so easily dispatched.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a &#8216;hack&#8217; (that does NOT require jailbreaking) to enable the battery percentage in the status bar. It was the first thing I did with my new iPod touch. If only the lack of an ambient light sensor problem was so easily dispatched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SadFanboi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1083446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SadFanboi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1083446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs is dead.  Steve Quality Control is dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs is dead.  Steve Quality Control is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/apples-new-ipod-touch-takes-a-step-back-no-light-sensor/#comment-1083117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=573013#comment-1083117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess it&#039;s a nice feature but really not critical for the iPod. It&#039;s not used in apps and not that accurate for screen dimming and you&#039;re not using as a phone to kill the screen.

I mean if you&#039;re not buying the iPod because of the light sensor and don&#039;t want the thinner body, larger screen, faster processeor, what else are you going to buy? You probably weren&#039;t going to buy it anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s a nice feature but really not critical for the iPod. It&#8217;s not used in apps and not that accurate for screen dimming and you&#8217;re not using as a phone to kill the screen.</p>
<p>I mean if you&#8217;re not buying the iPod because of the light sensor and don&#8217;t want the thinner body, larger screen, faster processeor, what else are you going to buy? You probably weren&#8217;t going to buy it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
