<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet the algorithm that&#8217;s way better than you at Sudoku</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1135922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1135922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like an apostrophe + &quot;re&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like an apostrophe + &#8220;re&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1081888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1081888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did exactly as jfkliberal did.  I did so many Sudoku puzzles that I realized the algorithm in my head, then coded it up just as an exercise.  After verifying it was correct, I Googled and found that lots of other people had already created automated Sudoku solvers.  It wasn&#039;t much of an accomplishment and it went into the bit bin quickly, but I still get to brag about it whenever a friend is doing a Sudoku.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did exactly as jfkliberal did.  I did so many Sudoku puzzles that I realized the algorithm in my head, then coded it up just as an exercise.  After verifying it was correct, I Googled and found that lots of other people had already created automated Sudoku solvers.  It wasn&#8217;t much of an accomplishment and it went into the bit bin quickly, but I still get to brag about it whenever a friend is doing a Sudoku.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1074365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1074365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good point, although I would argue most casual Sudoku puzzlers aren&#039;t at that point yet. Simple rules work with easy puzzles, but not with the harder puzzles where there&#039;s less data. I presume the real application of this will be in areas where we want to predict the behavior of more-complex, but rule-based systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point, although I would argue most casual Sudoku puzzlers aren&#8217;t at that point yet. Simple rules work with easy puzzles, but not with the harder puzzles where there&#8217;s less data. I presume the real application of this will be in areas where we want to predict the behavior of more-complex, but rule-based systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1074349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1074349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha. Thanks for the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1074348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1074348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very cool. I suspect you&#039;re right about the sophistication of this algorithm. Sudoku is a fine early proving ground, but hopefully its utility expands beyond just puzzles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool. I suspect you&#8217;re right about the sophistication of this algorithm. Sudoku is a fine early proving ground, but hopefully its utility expands beyond just puzzles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbrunnig7716</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1073815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mbrunnig7716]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1073815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hardly novel to solve a puzzle without guessing.  I built a program in excel using all the typical (and a number of rather atypical) logical techniques so that if I got stuck on a difficult puzzle it could highlight what I was doing wrong...solving the entire puzzle after that was merely a method of looping through the techniques.  I&#039;m sure this algorithm is significantly more advanced than mine was, buit&#039;s still fun to now and then pull the program up and let it solve a puzzle while I watch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hardly novel to solve a puzzle without guessing.  I built a program in excel using all the typical (and a number of rather atypical) logical techniques so that if I got stuck on a difficult puzzle it could highlight what I was doing wrong&#8230;solving the entire puzzle after that was merely a method of looping through the techniques.  I&#8217;m sure this algorithm is significantly more advanced than mine was, buit&#8217;s still fun to now and then pull the program up and let it solve a puzzle while I watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbrunnig7716</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1073802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mbrunnig7716]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1073802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A computer using logic to solve sudoku puzzles is hardly novel...I built a program in excel that uses all the logical techniques to solve sudoku puzzles so that if I ever got stuck I could figure out what I was doing wrong...of course all I have to do is loop the various techniques together and I can watch excel solve the full puzzles...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A computer using logic to solve sudoku puzzles is hardly novel&#8230;I built a program in excel that uses all the logical techniques to solve sudoku puzzles so that if I ever got stuck I could figure out what I was doing wrong&#8230;of course all I have to do is loop the various techniques together and I can watch excel solve the full puzzles&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfkliberal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1073356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfkliberal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1073356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I developed a computer program that can solve any Sudoku puzzle I have encountered.  It just mimmicks the way I solve them, using logic--if this then that.  It likely is not as sophisticated and ingenious and creative as the solver done by the team of researchers.  I am ready to believe that their solution may lead to further technological advances in medicine and space travel.  Mine?  Once I proved to myself that it would work on any Sudoku puzzle, I left it on the trash heap of personal achievements that no one in the world gives a damn about and continued solving the puzzles by hand.  For the life of me, I cannot imagine how people can solve the evil level puzzles in mere seconds.  But someday I will figure it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I developed a computer program that can solve any Sudoku puzzle I have encountered.  It just mimmicks the way I solve them, using logic&#8211;if this then that.  It likely is not as sophisticated and ingenious and creative as the solver done by the team of researchers.  I am ready to believe that their solution may lead to further technological advances in medicine and space travel.  Mine?  Once I proved to myself that it would work on any Sudoku puzzle, I left it on the trash heap of personal achievements that no one in the world gives a damn about and continued solving the puzzles by hand.  For the life of me, I cannot imagine how people can solve the evil level puzzles in mere seconds.  But someday I will figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrow Burket</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1073327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darrow Burket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1073327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have this backwards: Researchers likely used existing methods to solve Sudoku. I was taught methods in 1975 at the University of Illinois that would make quick work of Sudoku puzzles. They&#039;re for computers, though, and not feasible for humans to use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have this backwards: Researchers likely used existing methods to solve Sudoku. I was taught methods in 1975 at the University of Illinois that would make quick work of Sudoku puzzles. They&#8217;re for computers, though, and not feasible for humans to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonenone</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/12/meet-the-algorithm-thats-way-better-than-you-at-sudoku/#comment-1072106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nonenone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 06:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=572571#comment-1072106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an everyday sudoku solver I have to agree with Matt, if you have to guess your missing something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an everyday sudoku solver I have to agree with Matt, if you have to guess your missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
