<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What hardware companies should know about Kickstarter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeyMike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/#comment-1238443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeyMike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571448#comment-1238443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw XI3 at CES and have followed them a little bit  They have an interesting concept, but from the looks of things they lack the funding to get any traction with this thing.  I&#039;m surprised because I think it&#039;s a swell product and you hear all this talk about all the VC money going away from the consumer internet toward technology.   If I could suggest one thing to them it would be this:  Stop undermining your most important vendors by allowing a bunch of dropshippers to carry your stuff.  I&#039;ve been thinking of buying one of these and when I did a search on google shopping, 25+ online stores are carrying your stuff, but I&#039;ll bet none of them stock it.  Why feed a bunch of parasites? It looks like you&#039;re liquidating.  Your website stinks.  There are a lot of very cool possibilities for your products, but you have to read between the lines on your site to figure out what they are.  Even tech savvy people have a hard time figuring out what to do with XI3.  Tell &#039;em.  You gotta do more than fire off press releases and resorting to gimmicks like Kickstarter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw XI3 at CES and have followed them a little bit  They have an interesting concept, but from the looks of things they lack the funding to get any traction with this thing.  I&#8217;m surprised because I think it&#8217;s a swell product and you hear all this talk about all the VC money going away from the consumer internet toward technology.   If I could suggest one thing to them it would be this:  Stop undermining your most important vendors by allowing a bunch of dropshippers to carry your stuff.  I&#8217;ve been thinking of buying one of these and when I did a search on google shopping, 25+ online stores are carrying your stuff, but I&#8217;ll bet none of them stock it.  Why feed a bunch of parasites? It looks like you&#8217;re liquidating.  Your website stinks.  There are a lot of very cool possibilities for your products, but you have to read between the lines on your site to figure out what they are.  Even tech savvy people have a hard time figuring out what to do with XI3.  Tell &#8216;em.  You gotta do more than fire off press releases and resorting to gimmicks like Kickstarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Nichols</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/#comment-1061207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Nichols]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571448#comment-1061207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve already heard of a number of firms that are planning on using the Kickstarter method, but bypassing Kickstarter the site - just creating their own and then driving traffic to it. Anybody seen a company take this route successfully?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already heard of a number of firms that are planning on using the Kickstarter method, but bypassing Kickstarter the site &#8211; just creating their own and then driving traffic to it. Anybody seen a company take this route successfully?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/#comment-1060555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cliff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571448#comment-1060555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are writing as if there is something to lose by not getting funded on kickstarter.  You lose nothing, mind as well give it a shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are writing as if there is something to lose by not getting funded on kickstarter.  You lose nothing, mind as well give it a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Politis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/#comment-1057850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Politis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571448#comment-1057850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you missed the specs for both the X7A &amp; the X3A Modular Computer, realljjj, but both sets  are published within our Kickstarter Project. 

The specs for the X7A Modular Computer are found here: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/321923; while the specs for the X3A Modular Computer are found here: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/322184. 

Hope that helps.

Dave Politis, Xi3 Corporation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you missed the specs for both the X7A &amp; the X3A Modular Computer, realljjj, but both sets  are published within our Kickstarter Project. </p>
<p>The specs for the X7A Modular Computer are found here: <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/321923" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/321923</a>; while the specs for the X3A Modular Computer are found here: <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/322184" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/262476727/xi3-help-us-usher-in-the-post-pc-era/posts/322184</a>. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Dave Politis, Xi3 Corporation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realjjj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/what-hardware-companies-should-know-about-kickstarter/#comment-1057688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realjjj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571448#comment-1057688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adapteva and Xi3 are both bad examples since they made fundamental mistakes.
Xi3 costs way too much (nobody sane would pay 1k$ for a Trinity/Llano PC - not even sure what they are using,or if desktop or notebook parts) and they failed to even provide proper specs.
Adapteva doesn&#039;t have at least 1 application already developed that would appeal  to a large number of users (or if they do have it they aren&#039;t pushing it). What is the average Joe gonna do with the chip once he gets it (at a reasonable price)?Wait and hope that maybe someone, sometime soon,makes something he can use?
Both companies failed to sell their product , KS might not be a store but folks will always look at it that way and buy what they can use at a decent price and you can&#039;t just go there utterly unprepared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adapteva and Xi3 are both bad examples since they made fundamental mistakes.<br />
Xi3 costs way too much (nobody sane would pay 1k$ for a Trinity/Llano PC &#8211; not even sure what they are using,or if desktop or notebook parts) and they failed to even provide proper specs.<br />
Adapteva doesn&#8217;t have at least 1 application already developed that would appeal  to a large number of users (or if they do have it they aren&#8217;t pushing it). What is the average Joe gonna do with the chip once he gets it (at a reasonable price)?Wait and hope that maybe someone, sometime soon,makes something he can use?<br />
Both companies failed to sell their product , KS might not be a store but folks will always look at it that way and buy what they can use at a decent price and you can&#8217;t just go there utterly unprepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
