<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Mobile for Android: Slimmer, safer and faster than Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McCormack</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1060818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David McCormack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1060818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech note: When you build an Android app that has portions written in C/C++, the NDK produces multiple CPU-specific flavours of the native library and packages all of these in the .apk archive. At install time, only the flavour of the the native library that is appropriate to the target device gets extracted from the .apk. This is presumably what they are getting at with the &quot;sleek and slender&quot; claim. I would think, however, that the space efficiency of native vs Dalvik (Android&#039;s bytecode) is debatable. It would certainly be very dependent on the type of functionality being implemented in native.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech note: When you build an Android app that has portions written in C/C++, the NDK produces multiple CPU-specific flavours of the native library and packages all of these in the .apk archive. At install time, only the flavour of the the native library that is appropriate to the target device gets extracted from the .apk. This is presumably what they are getting at with the &#8220;sleek and slender&#8221; claim. I would think, however, that the space efficiency of native vs Dalvik (Android&#8217;s bytecode) is debatable. It would certainly be very dependent on the type of functionality being implemented in native.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterKnowItAll</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1059777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterKnowItAll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1059777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opera is the only browser I have found that properly re-flows text after a pinch-zoom to any level of zoom. Other browsers zoom text to fit the page after a double-tap, but further zooming results in no re-flow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is the only browser I have found that properly re-flows text after a pinch-zoom to any level of zoom. Other browsers zoom text to fit the page after a double-tap, but further zooming results in no re-flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jyothi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1059150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jyothi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1059150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is Opera&#039;s main problem, it is affecting images quality but in other browsers images are shown without affecting it&#039;s quality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is Opera&#8217;s main problem, it is affecting images quality but in other browsers images are shown without affecting it&#8217;s quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayanta</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1058641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayanta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1058641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every just talk about speed while comparing Browser, but I have my own criteria - &quot;rendering of page&quot;.  I had used almost all the available browser on my android phone, I found one noticeable issues in almost all  - the image. When loading the page, only text got adjusted as per my phone screen, but image files goes out of sync.  Even I faced the same issue with Chrome. Firefox is the only browser I had tested which render the image file correctly, hence I made it my default.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every just talk about speed while comparing Browser, but I have my own criteria &#8211; &#8220;rendering of page&#8221;.  I had used almost all the available browser on my android phone, I found one noticeable issues in almost all  &#8211; the image. When loading the page, only text got adjusted as per my phone screen, but image files goes out of sync.  Even I faced the same issue with Chrome. Firefox is the only browser I had tested which render the image file correctly, hence I made it my default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1057117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1057117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter, I completely agree with your viewpoint: What &quot;works&quot; faster to an individual is far better than any benchmark, which only gives a rough idea of performance in a particular circumstance. I&#039;ve learned from the past though: If I don&#039;t include a benchmark, commenters invariably ask for one. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I completely agree with your viewpoint: What &#8220;works&#8221; faster to an individual is far better than any benchmark, which only gives a rough idea of performance in a particular circumstance. I&#8217;ve learned from the past though: If I don&#8217;t include a benchmark, commenters invariably ask for one. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/09/opera-mobile-for-android-slimmer-safer-and-faster-than-chrome/#comment-1057066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=571331#comment-1057066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do benchmarks really matter that much anymore? I tend to just try the browser out and if it feels faster, I stick with it. Firefox for Android never really gets too much praise from the community...yet it seems to perform best for most of my needs. Chrome (on the other hand) performs like crap on my phone (Nexus S, btw).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do benchmarks really matter that much anymore? I tend to just try the browser out and if it feels faster, I stick with it. Firefox for Android never really gets too much praise from the community&#8230;yet it seems to perform best for most of my needs. Chrome (on the other hand) performs like crap on my phone (Nexus S, btw).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
