Comments on: Can Bitbucket prevail in a Github-obsessed world?

By: nevi_me

nevi_me — Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:30:41 +0000

I use Bitbucket over Github because of the difference in pricing models. I only use Github to follow the projects hosted there :) but Bitbucket for all my work. Any work which I want to be public is on Bitbucket and Github. I simulpush updates to both

By: threatstream

threatstream — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:55:38 +0000

We use bitbucket extensively http://threatstream.com and find it offers all the features we need as a startup within the free tier (private code repo). If we want to share code back with the community as open source then we can use github

By: icefyre

icefyre — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:21:34 +0000

Bitbucket is the only major code forge that lets you host private repositories for free. The others are either paid or force you to only use them for open source projects (e.g. Google Code)

By: accounts3

accounts3 — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:44:53 +0000

Thanks for the article. It was interesting to read about Attlassian making grand claims about revolution to team collaboration that their updates of BitBucket and Stash are bringing to the DVCS technologies because there are other vendors that are providing Git as well. For example we started testing http://www.assembla.com Git offerings after reading an article about them on the PRWeb http://www.prweb.com/releases/agile/subversion/prweb2705724.htm. We actually find their toolset to be more comprehensive than that is offered by the Attlassian

By: Jeff Putz

Jeff Putz — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:51:11 +0000

If you’re an open source kind of project, and are particularly fond of being part of a Microsoft-centric community, CodePlex is where it’s at. http://www.codeplex.com/