<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the solar trade dispute against China has accomplished: nada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/04/what-the-solar-trade-dispute-against-china-has-accomplished-nada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/04/what-the-solar-trade-dispute-against-china-has-accomplished-nada/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ucilia Wang</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/04/what-the-solar-trade-dispute-against-china-has-accomplished-nada/#comment-1044345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ucilia Wang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569954#comment-1044345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story is not meant to be a complete accounting of all trade actions between China and the rest of the world. But as an example I did point to the one Chinese is poised to make against U.S. silicon producers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is not meant to be a complete accounting of all trade actions between China and the rest of the world. But as an example I did point to the one Chinese is poised to make against U.S. silicon producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/04/what-the-solar-trade-dispute-against-china-has-accomplished-nada/#comment-1043688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 11:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569954#comment-1043688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article fails to mention retaliatory trade actions.  There is now more than one trade gun drawn and the risks ratcheted up, way up, not down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article fails to mention retaliatory trade actions.  There is now more than one trade gun drawn and the risks ratcheted up, way up, not down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
