4 Comments

Summary:

Reports are now surfacing that Sprint may counter Deutsche Telekom’s bid for MetroPCS. What would Sprint gain if it derails the Metro-T-Mobile merger? Sprint would get some attractive spectrum, but it won’t help its overall 4G strategy much. It’s licenses simply don’t line up with Metro’s.

Bloomberg is reporting that Sprint is considering countering Deutsche Telekom’s offer for MetroPCS, which would merge the regional operator with T-Mobile USA.  If true, it could start a bidding war for the country’s largest Tier II mobile player. But what would Sprint gain if it won?

I’ve criticized the ‘T-Metro’ deal because it foists together a CDMA operator and GSM operator. Sprint and MetroPCS, however, both use the same CDMA technology so you would think they would make perfect match. Well, it’s not so simple.

Sprint and Metros’ spectrum doesn’t line up quite so neatly. Both have CDMA networks at the 1900 MHz PCS band, but many of Metro’s 2G networks and the majority of its 4G LTE networks occupy the 1700 MHz/2100 MHz bands Advanced Wireless Service (AWS) band, to which Sprint is a complete stranger. Sure, spectrum is spectrum: Sprint could just expand into the new band. But it’s not simple.

As this Moasik Solutions map shows, MetroPCS owns a patchwork of licenses in different regions of the country. In order for Sprint to make full use of Metro’s LTE networks it would need to fill in those holes with new AWS airwaves. But no one happens to be selling. The remaining AWS licenses have been locked up T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, AT&T and Leap Wireless.

The fact is that Metro’s combination of technology and spectrum really only lines up with other operator: Leap. In the case of T-Mobile and Metro, their spectrum matches perfectly, but their technologies don’t. With Sprint and Metro it’s the opposite case: their technologies are in synch, but their airwaves aren’t.

The Holy Grail for all of the big operators these days is cobbling together nationwide 4G bands, which is why we’ve seen so much M&A and regulatory activity lately. AT&T wanted to create a super-4G band at AWS by buying T-Mobile. When that failed it began buying up new airwaves in the 2.3 GHz band and lobbying the FCC to approve those frequencies for 4G. Verizon just a closed its mammoth deal with the cable operators to buy up their 4G airwaves so it can launch a second LTE network across all of the country’s major metropolitan market. Sprint is shutting down its old Nextel iDEN systems to clear their 800 MHz airwaves for its own second LTE network.

Buying MetroPCS would give Sprint additional capacity in some pretty important markets like New York City, Los Angeles, Dallas and Boston. But it would also force it to maintain a separate LTE network that only works in portion of the country. It certainly won’t help Sprint’s long-term 4G strategy, and it would likely create more problems for Sprint in procuring devices that work in its myriad of whacky bands. The deal might be worthwhile for Sprint, but like T-Mobile it has to weigh whether that additional capacity is worth the money, time and hassle of buying another carrier and integrating its customers with its networks.

To get in the middle of T-Mobile’s engagement with MetroPCS, Sprint would have to pay a $150 million break-up fee, according to Bloomberg. But despite the additional costs, Sprint is likely going to be very cautious about any new merger considering its experience Nextel.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user Susan Law Cain

  1. Still makes more sense than Metro with TMO. Metro subs will be able to plug into the Sprint network on day one and get better service and coverage. It probably works well for Sprint customers in Metro areas as well.

    Sprint can add AWS to its network without too much difficulty after Network Vision is completed. It would be a matter of getting handsets with AWS added to them. Probably an engineering challenge, but not impossible.

    Share
  2. It was reported earlier that Sprint was not in the bidding game because its low on cash on hand because of its previous merger and the IPhone deal.

    Share
  3. Kevin,

    Given the LTE spectrum differences of both carriers, Sprint is supposedly going to run MiMo(Multi-Mode) based infrastructure. Could this not be used in the differentials of both technologies? The CDMA side of compatibility would most definitely be an initial win for both carriers as they could transition very easily. It would really be nice to see the LTE end work for both.

    BTW, I really love your tech editorials.

    John B.

    Share
    1. Kevin Fitchard Thursday, October 4, 2012

      Thanks John,

      There’s no question really that the technology work. It’s just a question of whether expanding into a new band in only a handful of markets is worth Sprint’s while. Basically it would be some immediate capacity gains, but doesn’t really take the big strategic picture into account.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post