<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube revamps content ID, defaults to DMCA in case of unresolved disputes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamiko Franklin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/#comment-1082760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamiko Franklin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569512#comment-1082760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If youre asking yourself &#039;What the %^%&amp;$ does this mean for me a content creator, user or uploader or you have questions about any other user generated content protection or commercialization issue, please feel free to contact us at legal@vipo-online.org. We really help and this is our area of expertise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If youre asking yourself &#8216;What the %^%&amp;$ does this mean for me a content creator, user or uploader or you have questions about any other user generated content protection or commercialization issue, please feel free to contact us at <a href="mailto:legal@vipo-online.org">legal@vipo-online.org</a>. We really help and this is our area of expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alias2u2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/#comment-1053587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alias2u2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569512#comment-1053587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like Republican Voter ID iniatitive, i.e. declaring a solution for a large problem that really isn&#039;t... and does not fix any real larger problems outside the zealots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Republican Voter ID iniatitive, i.e. declaring a solution for a large problem that really isn&#8217;t&#8230; and does not fix any real larger problems outside the zealots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nabeel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/#comment-1040190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nabeel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569512#comment-1040190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zagorath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/10/03/youtube-revamps-content-id-defaults-to-dmca-in-case-of-unresolved-disputes/#comment-1039331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zagorath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=569512#comment-1039331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I only hope that this will fix the problem that the YouTube content ID system has with automatically detecting recordings of pieces that are in the public domain.

An extra point, the YouTube information page about the appeals process states &quot;OR send a legal copyright notification. In this event, the video will be taken down and the uploader will receive a copyright strike.&quot; How does this relate to the copyright holders&#039; current ability to leave the video up while displaying ads on it? If the uploader does not appeal the copyright claim, can the copyright holder leave ads on it, but if the uploader appeals the only solution is to have the video taken down completely?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only hope that this will fix the problem that the YouTube content ID system has with automatically detecting recordings of pieces that are in the public domain.</p>
<p>An extra point, the YouTube information page about the appeals process states &#8220;OR send a legal copyright notification. In this event, the video will be taken down and the uploader will receive a copyright strike.&#8221; How does this relate to the copyright holders&#8217; current ability to leave the video up while displaying ads on it? If the uploader does not appeal the copyright claim, can the copyright holder leave ads on it, but if the uploader appeals the only solution is to have the video taken down completely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
