38 Comments

Summary:

Any excitement Nokia generated with its “floating lens” technology in the Lumia 920 smartphone was quickly squashed thanks to a video demo that didn’t use the Lumia to capture footage. This hands on video, however, shows that Nokia’s stabilization technology is the one to beat.

iPhone 5 vs Lumia 920

Nokia introduced new image stabilization technology earlier this month with the launch of its Lumia 920 smartphone, but audience excitement was quickly killed off: The company demonstrated the feature in a video that didn’t actually use Lumia handsets to capture the footage. So how impressive is — or isn’t — Nokia’s “floating lens” technology? There’s one way to find out: a hands-on test.

That’s exactly what Myriam Joire of Engadget did earlier this week. At Nokia’s research and development facility in Tampere, Finland, Joire mounted both a Lumia 920 and an iPhone 5 on a mount to capture the same video footage with both smartphones at the same time. The results are quite impressive, with the Lumia video far more stable:

How important is a high-quality stabilization feature in a smartphone? Some may not see the need now, but one only has to look at the trend of smartphone optics to see where things are heading. As Om pointed out this month, handheld devices are fast replacing point-and-shoot cameras thanks to improved image capture combined with connectivity for sharing.

The same attributes could easily apply to video on the go with smartphones eliminating the need for dedicated camcorders. I think Nokia is on to something here and expect other phone makers to focus — no pun intended — more on video capabilities in the near future.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. “The results are quite impressive, with the Lumia video far more stable.” You’re kidding, right? Watch that again.

    1. I agree with your comment! The colors look better on Nokia, but stabilization? give me a break. Regardless, I do feel that Windows will be a strong competitor in the mobile space in a couple years.

    2. The lumia on this video may seem kinda shaky at times in comparison to the iphone…but that’s simple physics…the lumia camera lens is much further away from the middle where the guy is holding than the iphone lens…the vibration is more when the distance from the origin of the shake increases…
      IMO the lumia still managed do quite well even after that…

  2. Would be easier to tell the difference if the videos had the same crop/magnification.

    1. That makes sense, but buy using the native image capture, the video shows another key difference; a wider view from the Nokia camera.

  3. Wow Nokia camera is better. The iPhones camera jumped up to much.

  4. @Kevin. Sorry but you’re smoking crack if you think the Lumia is far more stable. More realistic colors yes, but OIS is unimpressive in the video.

    1. So to your eye, the iPhone 5 offers better image stabilization (but less realistic colors)?

      1. Correct. To my eyes the Lumia had better image quality. But that side by side comparison for the OIS feature did not make me think it more stable than the iPhone.

        Last week, The Verge posted some Russian developers doing an OIS comparison with the Lumia 920 vs a Galaxy S III. They mounted both phones to a remote controlled car. The OIS was much more impressive there.

        Link: http://mobile.theverge.com/2012/9/21/3368146/lumia-920-radio-controlled-car-ois

        1. Fair enough. I’m not suggesting people dump iPhones and get a Lumia by any means – people should buy and use what suits their needs best. To my eye, the OIS is better on the Lumia FWIW. Thanks!

    2. I would recommend to turn on HD resolution and then watch each video separately (by putting a piece of paper to cover the other video). That helped me to see the difference, which was actually quite big then.

      What OIS solves really well are those low-amplitude, high frequency shakes. The big ones are still there. I guess camerawoman should have tried to keep camera a little bit more stable. If you are interested, then look at the RC car test in youtube done by some Russians (though it was SGS3 vs Lumia 920 and not iPhone 5)

      1. Perhaps the test should have had less shake overall to prove anything?

    3. are you serious? watch the vídeo again in the part when he stars running. there is no comparison the iphone is all over the place while the nokia is quite stable

  5. I am an iPhone user and i find the Lumia image quality better, but the stabilization subjectively appears to be about a wash to me.

    How about retesting against a bunch of horizontal and vertical lines (fence posts are a good sample test) while walking over un-level terrain, instead of a level parking lot?

    Otherwise your conclusion is baseless.

  6. “At Nokia’s research and development facility in Tampere, Finland”
    Hmmm… Smells of bias.

    1. The Lumia 920 isn’t available yet, so the test pretty much had to be done in conjunction with Nokia.

  7. I noticed earlier that the iPhone software OIS seems to also compensate for rotation, something the sensor shift tech cannot compensate for. Or am I imagining this?

  8. The video is kinda nice way to impress one but I think there is at least one major difference everyone should be aware of.
    The two camera predictably has different focal lenght (I assume this becasue of the very different field of view) which causes different inches/millimeters (pixels are irrelevant) movement at the same angle change (shaking the cam) resulting more or less blurry/broken frame.

    However, I’m not tallking about the quality of the image (color, resolution, etc.) that’s only question of taste :-)

    1. I was thinking the same thing. To be taken seriously, they should have set the same focal length.

  9. Lindsworth Horatio Deer Friday, September 28, 2012

    Very True. By making the lens effectively suspended in a pivotless system akin to a gyroscope, image stabilization is vastly improved for fast, jerky situations. Lumia 920 get a one-up on Apple with this one!! http://bit.ly/TOr3xS

  10. I would have to agree with the masses here. As I was watching, it seemed the iPhone had better stabilization but they were both very close. How the author could deduce that the Nokia’s stabilization, “is the one to beat.” Clearly, they both did well. I will agree that the colors appeared richer on the Nokia video.

    1. are you blind or what? :D , how can be better that frickin apple DIGITAL stabilization .. :D

  11. LOL stupid applefan really think the digital stabilization better than nokia optical. XD
    Nokia lumia win all of challenge of course (Y)

  12. Nice post and according to me iPhone is far better than Lumia 920 because there are so many features in iPhone like A6 processor, light weight, wireless technology etc and Lumia 920 have Microsoft window 8 phone. Both have 8 mega pixel camera but Lumia have better camera quality, but overall iPhone have better stabilization.

  13. Two points of contention:

    Compare the videos agarin… the Nokia seems to do better when there is a lot of hand movement going on, with much smoother video motion at those times, while moments of smaller jerks of the hand seemed to make the video from the Nokia jump, while the iPhone remained smooth. So iPhone for day-to-day careful filming when trying to get a birthday party memory, Nokia for trying to catch a bus? :D

    On the color side I see a serious issua with “better color”. The question is whether you want vibrant color, or realistic color. Personally, I always want realistic. I am not trying to make a hollywood movie, I want the scene to be as I remember it. Plus, you can always make video more vibrant later on in processing. trying to get back to the actual color of the scene is nearly impossible unless you have something to compar… difficult if you are already back home after your trip to disney world ;)

  14. Oh, and I think the iPhone has more realistic color ;) (just look at the one guy’s face walking ahead of the crowd into the parking lot… looks sunburnt… unlikely for Finland this time of the year :D )

  15. Interesting how we all perceive it differently. I thought the Nokia excelled at this compared to the iPhone…like it wasn’t even close. Obviously we all perceive it differently so it becomes subjective.

  16. Tümay Kılınç Monday, October 1, 2012

    Lumia 920 video is clearly more stable and offers richer colors. I read the comments, although i am an Apple user, i have to disagree with the comments. The difference is too much to ignore.

  17. Nobody can beat apple..an undisputed champ in all segments
    check russian are already compalining about Nokia lumia 920
    http://techkiddy.blogspot.in/2012/10/lumia-920-battery-problem.html

    1. Like Nokia didn’t think abt a problem as obvious as that…and in what world can you perceive that as complaining?? The battery loss never happened in the first place to complain abt. The word you should be looking for is ‘concern’. Anyway.. Nokia has already responded to those with doubts.

      http://www.wpcentral.com/no-nokia-lumia-920-does-not-have-problem-accidental-display-activations

      And gimme a break…like iPhone is immune to battery issues!’Undisputed Champ In All Segments’… You couldn’t be more biased..

  18. Mark Langston Tuesday, October 2, 2012

    Wow! The Lumia did kinda embarrass the iPhone. The colors were a lot crisper, the framing seemed to be capturing more to the left and right, and the stabilization was night and day.

    I’m really, really impressed and honestly jealous. I’d almost consider getting a Lumia just for the camera but I don’t think I could stomach the Windows Phone 8 interface. I’m not a fan of Win8 at all and the new 8 interface just looks like a congested mess with no negative space meaning the end of personalized wallpaper.

    The wallpaper is now whatever images and information that’s sliding up and down in the live tiles and the color of the tiles.

  19. Wahid Roshan Surya Saturday, October 13, 2012

    a manner of taking base data for resolution and colour would have been to mount these two devices (or three) on a double armed tripod so they would be at exactly the same level… each of the lenses would then have to be slightly angled (in an arc for multiple devices) to face, a relatively common “vanishing point”, so the comings and goings of traffic or people (into and out of the frame, that is) would be very similar… then have them take outdoor shots and indoor shots (one may add shaded outdoor shots, as well)… then we could compare them to the handheld shots, yes? however, some people’s hands are naturally shakier than others, as well…

  20. Perhaps there should have been less shake overall to prove anything.
    Usually, when you turn the camera you expect it to show in the recorded video.

  21. I don’t think Nokia has the power, or the time to choose which carrier/s would be preferable to its business interests.
    Nokia can only wait, and hope for the best.

  22. I honestly can not understand how anyone can say the Lumia wasn’t the clear winner? There is less up/down jerkiness, white is whiter, black is blacker, it is just a touch sharper. There really is no need to cover one while watching the other. Although I tried that too.

    Are you kidding Adam?

  23. lumia is better……

  24. iPhone 5 is doomed

Comments have been disabled for this post