Comments on: Five reasons why media companies should pay attention to The Atlantic http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/ Thu, 23 May 2013 02:16:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Big Rob http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1244806 Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:58:01 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1244806 Yes, because The Atlantic is and has always been a shill for corporate interests and economic conservatism… which you prove by pointing out the one (past) blogger who was libertarian on its staff.

How exciting — I didn’t realize it was cherry-picking season already!

]]> By: spotmagicsolis http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1175929 Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:26:41 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1175929 I like so thumbs up to The Atlantic.

]]> By: MisterJay Em http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1080136 Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:02:37 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1080136 I’m sure there are worse journalistic developments than publication-specific apps, but there aren’t many that wasted so much time and money.

– MrJM

]]> By: MisterJay Em http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1080090 Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:51:31 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1080090 Citation please.

]]> By: Greg Bulmash http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1035133 Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:25:56 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1035133 http://news.yahoo.com/thinkprogress-gets-hit-googles-red-screen-doom-174454304.html

Sourced from the Atlantic Wire, completely unreadable, and not at all proofread. Despicably bad. All The Atlantic’s brand means to me lately is that they fired the costly people with grammar skills and are being written by Honey Boo Boo’s poor relations in exchange for roadkill and moonshine.

]]> By: Marshall http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1029825 Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:14:36 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1029825 Every time I land on the Atlantic, I’m impresses by the quality of the content. Glad to read they’ve found a way to pay for it.

]]> By: dbrownblogs http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1028359 Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:14:30 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1028359 Reblogged this on BrownGoods and commented:
Interesting stuff here.

]]> By: Stephen http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1027395 Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:04:11 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1027395 We should pay very very close to the Atlantic and the way it does business. One of tge Atlantic’s “journalists” was Megan McArdle, was Koch-Brothers paid shill, trained at their Institute for Humane Studies and then given a leadership role at the Koch Brother’s America’s Future Foundation.
Furthermore, the Atlantic runs the official PR at the Aspen Institue, another Koch Brother supported institution.
So yes…we should certainly be paying attention to what the Atlantic does, and no doubt the Atlantic is now making lots of money. The devil pays top dollar.

]]> By: Kevin Horne http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1024983 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:48:52 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1024983 Have to laugh at this “buzz” for a site (qz.com) that doesnt load (at least on Friday)…

]]> By: mediahor http://gigaom.com/2012/09/27/five-reasons-why-media-companies-should-pay-attention-to-the-atlantic/#comment-1023874 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:58:23 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=567413#comment-1023874 the atlantic DID NOT grow digital revenue by almost 50%. not even close

]]>