5 Comments

Summary:

New York magazine is doing better than ever, with outstanding reporting and a healthy bottom line. Is the publication an outlier or can other city magazines imitate its strategy?

Screen Shot 2012-09-26 at 1.38.59 PM

New York magazine has always puzzled me. In an era of death spirals for traditional city news magazines, it not only avoided financial ruin but become a top-shelf reporting powerhouse that sometimes rivals the New Yorker. What did it do to flourish while others teetered?

This week, Advertising Age has a good account of how New York became a profitable online success story. The article explains how an early embrace of digital is helping New York outstrip others:

Consumer magazines draw only about five percent to fifteen percent of their ad sales from their digital operations, analysts and insiders say. New York‘s digital properties, by contrast, account for forty percent of the company’s total ad sales.

The publication is pouring these new revenues back into reporting and has created a virtuous cycle in which high-quality journalism attracts high-quality ads. As Ad Age explains, New York’s high profile reporting has helped it reach beyond a regional audience:

New York Media sites drew 4.8 million unique visitors, according to ComScore, providing the scale that large marketers require. And with nearly 80 percent of its online audience coming from outside New York, the publication gives star political writers Frank Rich and John Heilemann a national platform.

The magazine’s new prominence has also succeeded in attracted valuable luxury brand advertisers like Bergdorf Goodman.

It’s a nice story but New York may be an outlier and not a model for other city magazines. One reason is that New York invested early enough to turn the digital corner before print revenues started their dramatic decline; it may be too late for others to do the same. The magazine may also be a special case because the size of its regional market provided a big enough base to scale into a national audience. It seems unlikely that city magazines in Philadelphia, Seattle or even Chicago could do the same, no matter how great their writing.

For now, the future of city coverage may belong to specialists like Curbed Media which, like New York, has pulled in major marketers (see our profile on Curbed here). It do so by offering high-quality reporting on local niches like real estate and food under a common brand. Perhaps city magazines can work out a similar strategy.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Reblogged this on PostPrint and commented:
    Weekly print publication New York magazine leapt into digital early and now it is reaping the rewards – profits and revenue are at their highest levels since 2003 and it’s growing! It’s also a great example of how localised content can be of national and even global interest online, 80% of NYmag.com traffic is not from New York. But then again, who isn’t interested in what’s happening in New York! It might be a touch harder for a city mag from Adelaide to attract that kind of online traction.

  2. New York is a weekly. Virtually all the city magazines are monthlies. New York therefore has a solid base of users who want current entertainment data, something the others can’t offer. Weekly publication allow New York to respond to specific events, rather than just posting the latest top 100 restaurants list. That scheduling diifference accounts for almost all of the distinction between New York and other city magazines.

    1. Insightful observation, stephenmarmon — thanks for sharing.. I wonder though if “current entertainment data” is enough to explain the difference.. After all, doesn’t digital publishing make such data just another commodity?

  3. Mike Shatzkin Monday, October 1, 2012

    New York is a city of international interest and importance. Doesn’t anybody think that might have something to do with it?

    1. I’m sure those humble, superannuated New Yorkers do…

Comments have been disabled for this post