<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How did Google+ get 100M active users? Hint: they&#8217;re not reading your posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1216477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1216477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Google+ is aware about that it couldn&#039;t get spammed, that&#039;s why Google+ is not allowing self promotion unlike Twitter and Facebook entertain this. Google wont forget that Orkut is RIP , so they dont want to give any chance. 

In the way there is so much possibility to have 100 million user since it has Hangout and circle Privacy feature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Google+ is aware about that it couldn&#8217;t get spammed, that&#8217;s why Google+ is not allowing self promotion unlike Twitter and Facebook entertain this. Google wont forget that Orkut is RIP , so they dont want to give any chance. </p>
<p>In the way there is so much possibility to have 100 million user since it has Hangout and circle Privacy feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigorangeplanet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1213269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigorangeplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1213269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FB and G+ are 2 completely different animals. In my view FB is very often about &#039;wasting the boss&#039; time talking to folks you haven&#039;t seen in 15 years, whereas G+ is more about bringing together folks who will probably never meet each other, but share interests]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FB and G+ are 2 completely different animals. In my view FB is very often about &#8216;wasting the boss&#8217; time talking to folks you haven&#8217;t seen in 15 years, whereas G+ is more about bringing together folks who will probably never meet each other, but share interests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vince pahkala</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1119596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vince pahkala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1119596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the actual active users on googles plus are very carefully indexed on the circlecount website where you can get all the stats you want- their splash page shows 20419000 users accounted for that are currently active i confirmed this by adding 50 non active users to my google plus circles profile then ran the update feature located on circlecount on my profile and voila! no change! then i went back deleted the users and added 50 active ones and BAM! my following circlecount rose by 50-im not sure what the criteria is for the alogorithym that circlecount is using but i can see that this maybe a real world wide web actual accounting method of who is actually using google plus and who is not-so the 400 million users announcement as of todays post that i read is true but the actual active users versus the ones that just create a profile are 2 totally different virtual markers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the actual active users on googles plus are very carefully indexed on the circlecount website where you can get all the stats you want- their splash page shows 20419000 users accounted for that are currently active i confirmed this by adding 50 non active users to my google plus circles profile then ran the update feature located on circlecount on my profile and voila! no change! then i went back deleted the users and added 50 active ones and BAM! my following circlecount rose by 50-im not sure what the criteria is for the alogorithym that circlecount is using but i can see that this maybe a real world wide web actual accounting method of who is actually using google plus and who is not-so the 400 million users announcement as of todays post that i read is true but the actual active users versus the ones that just create a profile are 2 totally different virtual markers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1047209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mmk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1047209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[facebook have any qualified rights to comment on google plus,facebook is like an small school application,is facebook have a guts to provide all the things which will be provided by google plus?.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facebook have any qualified rights to comment on google plus,facebook is like an small school application,is facebook have a guts to provide all the things which will be provided by google plus?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1044316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1044316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that always bugged me about Facebook were their &quot;active users stats&quot; which may or may not count anytime you pass over a like button elsewhere on a site that isn&#039;t Facebook.

So for this reason I made a point of deleting ky Google+ account from my Gopgle account so I can ensure I am never a falsely cpunted &quot;user&quot;.  I love Google and their services but I find Google+ to be a pointless irritation at best.  The slow creep of G+ into everything else Google does is slowly killing these services (sometimes literally) and more and more I feel the desire to just abandon ship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that always bugged me about Facebook were their &#8220;active users stats&#8221; which may or may not count anytime you pass over a like button elsewhere on a site that isn&#8217;t Facebook.</p>
<p>So for this reason I made a point of deleting ky Google+ account from my Gopgle account so I can ensure I am never a falsely cpunted &#8220;user&#8221;.  I love Google and their services but I find Google+ to be a pointless irritation at best.  The slow creep of G+ into everything else Google does is slowly killing these services (sometimes literally) and more and more I feel the desire to just abandon ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tenant Advisor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1001960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Tenant Advisor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1001960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are at lease 10 million users arguing about cell phones on G+ hourly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are at lease 10 million users arguing about cell phones on G+ hourly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1001900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1001900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hangouts are hosted on plus.google.com....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hangouts are hosted on plus.google.com&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darnell Clayton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1001888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darnell Clayton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1001888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not following your argument here. If 100 million use Google+ via mobile (which probably means web apps, iOS &amp; Android apps) as well as the main site directly, how does that equate to people not reading your posts?

Also using Google Talk as &quot;evidence&quot; for inflated use is weak as you don&#039;t even attempt to dig up usage numbers from Google regarding Google Talk to see if Google Talk is the reason Google+ is so &quot;active.&quot;

Vic seemed fairly clear when stating where the 100 million is coming from (and that is out of 400 million accounts which means Google+ is only being used actively by 25% of their total plus population). 

From my own personal observations of friends who have a Google+ account (but do not post anything upon it), they use Google+ directly mainly for Hangouts) as its cheaper than Skype group chats and they can do it from their smartphone with multiple people. 

While Google+ activity is no where near Facebook&#039;s billion, it&#039;s not a ghost town either--and to subtly accuse Google+ of inflating their numbers without strong evidence is great for page views but damages GigaOm&#039;s image.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not following your argument here. If 100 million use Google+ via mobile (which probably means web apps, iOS &amp; Android apps) as well as the main site directly, how does that equate to people not reading your posts?</p>
<p>Also using Google Talk as &#8220;evidence&#8221; for inflated use is weak as you don&#8217;t even attempt to dig up usage numbers from Google regarding Google Talk to see if Google Talk is the reason Google+ is so &#8220;active.&#8221;</p>
<p>Vic seemed fairly clear when stating where the 100 million is coming from (and that is out of 400 million accounts which means Google+ is only being used actively by 25% of their total plus population). </p>
<p>From my own personal observations of friends who have a Google+ account (but do not post anything upon it), they use Google+ directly mainly for Hangouts) as its cheaper than Skype group chats and they can do it from their smartphone with multiple people. </p>
<p>While Google+ activity is no where near Facebook&#8217;s billion, it&#8217;s not a ghost town either&#8211;and to subtly accuse Google+ of inflating their numbers without strong evidence is great for page views but damages GigaOm&#8217;s image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten Myrstad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1001860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morten Myrstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1001860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could have been right. But Vic Gundotra commented in the stream that the 100 million monthly active users did NOT include Google+-related activity outside of the site itself. This is what he posted: 
&quot;The numbers at I/O were google+ users all across Google. So gmail users who used circles, or Android users who plus oned an app etc were included. Today&#039;s number of 100m is just on our plus.google.com destination site and the mobile app.&quot; So I would think that those 100m DID read your post!:), to use your words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could have been right. But Vic Gundotra commented in the stream that the 100 million monthly active users did NOT include Google+-related activity outside of the site itself. This is what he posted:<br />
&#8220;The numbers at I/O were google+ users all across Google. So gmail users who used circles, or Android users who plus oned an app etc were included. Today&#8217;s number of 100m is just on our plus.google.com destination site and the mobile app.&#8221; So I would think that those 100m DID read your post!:), to use your words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A S</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/17/google-plus-100m-users/#comment-1001812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=563596#comment-1001812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; we might one day all be using Google+ — but still think that no one is using it.

Google would be quite fine with that. It is a deliberate strategy by Google to make G+ part of people&#039;s normal interaction with Google, instead of being a separate site where people have to go to do something different.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; we might one day all be using Google+ — but still think that no one is using it.</p>
<p>Google would be quite fine with that. It is a deliberate strategy by Google to make G+ part of people&#8217;s normal interaction with Google, instead of being a separate site where people have to go to do something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
