<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s AT&amp;T planning? Hidden specs unearthed in the GSM iPhone 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DimSu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-1233329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DimSu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-1233329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what a bunch of bull.  Tmobile turned down GSM?  seriously?  Who is your source?

WIth respect to bands - 
An Iphone has a radio, it also has functionality built in.  It is not unlikely that if you have  radio that car read a certain frequency (AWS, PCS etc) that it interfaces to a chip that can decode the signal (LTE, WCDMA-UMTS).  So, yes it is likely you can activate PCS-LTE, or AWS-LTE, or AWS-WCDMA.  This simply means, that the Iphone 5 can work on T-mobile&#039;s AWS frequencies as a 3G phone... or later onto their AWS LTE frequencies. Afterall, LTE and UMTS are related technologies that share an evolution and are backwards compatible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a bunch of bull.  Tmobile turned down GSM?  seriously?  Who is your source?</p>
<p>WIth respect to bands &#8211;<br />
An Iphone has a radio, it also has functionality built in.  It is not unlikely that if you have  radio that car read a certain frequency (AWS, PCS etc) that it interfaces to a chip that can decode the signal (LTE, WCDMA-UMTS).  So, yes it is likely you can activate PCS-LTE, or AWS-LTE, or AWS-WCDMA.  This simply means, that the Iphone 5 can work on T-mobile&#8217;s AWS frequencies as a 3G phone&#8230; or later onto their AWS LTE frequencies. Afterall, LTE and UMTS are related technologies that share an evolution and are backwards compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-1039187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-1039187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin. 
Here is a good question you might be able to answer...or at least find out. Do other AT&amp;T LTE phones, like the HTC OneX, also contain those PCS and Cellular frequencies? If so then it might be happening very soon which I think is awesome. The people in the northeast part of Michigan are jumping ship to Verizon because the AT&amp;T network up there is TERRIBLE. It&#039;s still on the old (non Class 10 or 12) EDGE network which is slower than dialup!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin.<br />
Here is a good question you might be able to answer&#8230;or at least find out. Do other AT&amp;T LTE phones, like the HTC OneX, also contain those PCS and Cellular frequencies? If so then it might be happening very soon which I think is awesome. The people in the northeast part of Michigan are jumping ship to Verizon because the AT&amp;T network up there is TERRIBLE. It&#8217;s still on the old (non Class 10 or 12) EDGE network which is slower than dialup!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Singer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-1012544</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Singer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-1012544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-Mobile has already shut down most of their 2G network!  This is news to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile has already shut down most of their 2G network!  This is news to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Kerton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-998958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Kerton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-998958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;He obviously was referring to the Nordics.&quot;

@24 Ya think? He didn&#039;t say that, though, did he? He said &quot;we are behind MUCH of Europe.&quot;

And the Nordics have 25 million residents, a 3.3% share of the EU&#039;s 740 million. That&#039;s not really representative of Europe, is it?  Certainly it isn&#039;t &quot;much of Europe&quot;.  And I was being generous when I carved out &quot;the Nordics&quot; because, really, only one carrier launched LTE before Verizon: TeliaSonera, and they only covered the few major cities in their network. That was impressive, no doubt, but let&#039;s also note that TeliaSonera only offered it on modems, and their first LTE phone was in 2012...yeah, long AFTER the USA. And that was the first LTE phone marketed in all of Europe. Here&#039;s an article that may set you right:

http://www.intomobile.com/2012/03/05/sweden-becomes-first-country-europe-get-4g-lte-smartphones/

Meanwhile Verizon LTE covers  371 cities and 75% of the U.S. population. But AT&amp;T also has LTE, Sprint has had 4G OFDM WiMAX for years and now has LTE, MetroPCS has had LTE for over a year, etc. etc. The USA auctioned off our LTE exTV spectrum in 2007, years ahead of other regions, most of which still have not migrated their TV to digital. So, your comment ranks down there with Julius&#039;.

The USA has been a cellular laggard in eras past, but it is a leader today. We are ahead in digital dividend spectrum management, ahead in innovative secondary incentive markets for spectrum re-allocation, ahead in all 4G network technologies, ahead in white spaces, we produce 3 of the top mobile OSes, the top search engines, the top speech recognition engines, we produce a large portion of the sector&#039;s start-up and innovation, and its mobile content. To say &quot;we are behind Europe&quot;, you&#039;d have to have been under a rock for 12 years, and have emerged mostly stoned.

BTW, I have no problem with the USA coming second, third or fourth. Geez, I&#039;m used to much worse when I look at global rankings of education, health, happiness, etc. I also encourage Europe to break ahead again, and take the lead in the future. I don&#039;t care where innovations happen, just so long as it happens.

Lookat that. You wrote 7 words, and I offered you a clinic in return. You&#039;re welcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He obviously was referring to the Nordics.&#8221;</p>
<p>@24 Ya think? He didn&#8217;t say that, though, did he? He said &#8220;we are behind MUCH of Europe.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the Nordics have 25 million residents, a 3.3% share of the EU&#8217;s 740 million. That&#8217;s not really representative of Europe, is it?  Certainly it isn&#8217;t &#8220;much of Europe&#8221;.  And I was being generous when I carved out &#8220;the Nordics&#8221; because, really, only one carrier launched LTE before Verizon: TeliaSonera, and they only covered the few major cities in their network. That was impressive, no doubt, but let&#8217;s also note that TeliaSonera only offered it on modems, and their first LTE phone was in 2012&#8230;yeah, long AFTER the USA. And that was the first LTE phone marketed in all of Europe. Here&#8217;s an article that may set you right:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2012/03/05/sweden-becomes-first-country-europe-get-4g-lte-smartphones/" rel="nofollow">http://www.intomobile.com/2012/03/05/sweden-becomes-first-country-europe-get-4g-lte-smartphones/</a></p>
<p>Meanwhile Verizon LTE covers  371 cities and 75% of the U.S. population. But AT&amp;T also has LTE, Sprint has had 4G OFDM WiMAX for years and now has LTE, MetroPCS has had LTE for over a year, etc. etc. The USA auctioned off our LTE exTV spectrum in 2007, years ahead of other regions, most of which still have not migrated their TV to digital. So, your comment ranks down there with Julius&#8217;.</p>
<p>The USA has been a cellular laggard in eras past, but it is a leader today. We are ahead in digital dividend spectrum management, ahead in innovative secondary incentive markets for spectrum re-allocation, ahead in all 4G network technologies, ahead in white spaces, we produce 3 of the top mobile OSes, the top search engines, the top speech recognition engines, we produce a large portion of the sector&#8217;s start-up and innovation, and its mobile content. To say &#8220;we are behind Europe&#8221;, you&#8217;d have to have been under a rock for 12 years, and have emerged mostly stoned.</p>
<p>BTW, I have no problem with the USA coming second, third or fourth. Geez, I&#8217;m used to much worse when I look at global rankings of education, health, happiness, etc. I also encourage Europe to break ahead again, and take the lead in the future. I don&#8217;t care where innovations happen, just so long as it happens.</p>
<p>Lookat that. You wrote 7 words, and I offered you a clinic in return. You&#8217;re welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 24</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-998740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-998740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He obviously was referring to the Nordics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He obviously was referring to the Nordics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-997799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 04:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-997799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe they plan to buy the smaller players one by one since they could not get t-mobile. or maybe they plan to be the de-facto roaming partners for all the small players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they plan to buy the smaller players one by one since they could not get t-mobile. or maybe they plan to be the de-facto roaming partners for all the small players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-997605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-997605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But yeah, you&#039;re right. It is pretty messed up that it supported one carrier&#039;s future demands, but not another carrier&#039;s current ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But yeah, you&#8217;re right. It is pretty messed up that it supported one carrier&#8217;s future demands, but not another carrier&#8217;s current ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-997595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-997595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Tellie, Apple actually did make a T-Mobile iPhone. It just made it for where T-Mobile will be in a year, rather than the network it has today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tellie, Apple actually did make a T-Mobile iPhone. It just made it for where T-Mobile will be in a year, rather than the network it has today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-997592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-997592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ian, all good points. But they&#039;re based on long-term and hypothetical carrier plans. Apple simply doesn&#039;t do business that way. It wouldn&#039;t even put 2.6 GHz in the phone for European operators. Why would it entertain all of these what ifs for much smaller players?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, all good points. But they&#8217;re based on long-term and hypothetical carrier plans. Apple simply doesn&#8217;t do business that way. It wouldn&#8217;t even put 2.6 GHz in the phone for European operators. Why would it entertain all of these what ifs for much smaller players?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tellie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/09/13/whats-att-planning-hidden-specs-unearthed-in-the-gsm-iphone-5/#comment-997579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tellie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=562783#comment-997579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ok so apple will make a phone with the capability of accessing frequencies NO ONE in the foreseeable future is using &quot;just in case AT&amp;T might use it some time down the road&quot; but its &quot;technically impossible to also include UMTS/HSPA on AWS for Tmobile and the few others that use AWS for that purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok so apple will make a phone with the capability of accessing frequencies NO ONE in the foreseeable future is using &#8220;just in case AT&amp;T might use it some time down the road&#8221; but its &#8220;technically impossible to also include UMTS/HSPA on AWS for Tmobile and the few others that use AWS for that purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
