<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fact-checking politics: Why we need &#8220;open journalism&#8221; more than ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katielynnowen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-1212234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[katielynnowen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-1212234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first time I heard about fact checking was in Tim McGuire’s class. He described it as a process where you flush out questions by making sure the facts in the article, speech, or televised program are true. From this I learned you have to do a serious of questions, and in-depth research to make sure the message is one hundred percent accurate. He also mentioned as journalists this is what makes us a credible source.  Tonight Steve Elliott, Kristen DelGuzzi, Alex Ferri, and Christina Leonard did just that. 

Director of Digital News, Steve Elliot believes journalists are leaving their traditional roles behind. Fact checking is a role that we stand firm on, and some leave it behind. Kristen DelGuzzi from AZ Fact Check says, “Fact checking is what good journalists do, and is also a service here in Phoenix, Arizona.” Reporters will send in questions, so they can fact check. But they don’t fact check on your average Joe. They fact check on elite members of society because not everyone tells the truth. Sadly, people tend to extend the truth, and twist it into what they want the viewer to hear. This is where AZ Fact Check comes in, and fills in the truth, or falsehood. 

Alex Ferri, another member from AZ Fact Check believes, “[Fact checking] really flexes your muscles in trying to find documents, and I think it’s a really good basis for journalism.” So if you want to leap down the journalistic river bend, you must fact check and be willing to call out a lie a lie.  After all, this is what makes you commendable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I heard about fact checking was in Tim McGuire’s class. He described it as a process where you flush out questions by making sure the facts in the article, speech, or televised program are true. From this I learned you have to do a serious of questions, and in-depth research to make sure the message is one hundred percent accurate. He also mentioned as journalists this is what makes us a credible source.  Tonight Steve Elliott, Kristen DelGuzzi, Alex Ferri, and Christina Leonard did just that. </p>
<p>Director of Digital News, Steve Elliot believes journalists are leaving their traditional roles behind. Fact checking is a role that we stand firm on, and some leave it behind. Kristen DelGuzzi from AZ Fact Check says, “Fact checking is what good journalists do, and is also a service here in Phoenix, Arizona.” Reporters will send in questions, so they can fact check. But they don’t fact check on your average Joe. They fact check on elite members of society because not everyone tells the truth. Sadly, people tend to extend the truth, and twist it into what they want the viewer to hear. This is where AZ Fact Check comes in, and fills in the truth, or falsehood. </p>
<p>Alex Ferri, another member from AZ Fact Check believes, “[Fact checking] really flexes your muscles in trying to find documents, and I think it’s a really good basis for journalism.” So if you want to leap down the journalistic river bend, you must fact check and be willing to call out a lie a lie.  After all, this is what makes you commendable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-999172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-999172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Switched to Mediamatters as a non-biased and reliable source?  Speaking of being effed up!  Wow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Switched to Mediamatters as a non-biased and reliable source?  Speaking of being effed up!  Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-999170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-999170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MediaMatters?   Seriously?!

Hilarious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MediaMatters?   Seriously?!</p>
<p>Hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Hammer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-968291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Hammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-968291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOLing @ what passes for &quot;fact checking&quot; from liberals! What they call &quot;fact checking&quot; means whether it agrees with liberal dogma. If it doesn&#039;t it is labeled &quot;false&quot;.

Left-wing bias in media is endemic, and a reason why they can&#039;t see a true statement as true when it disagrees with their bias(es) and why they let leftist falsehoods go without comment.

It is sad that the left has gone so far around the bend that their definition of &quot;truth&quot; has become &quot;does it agree with liberal dogma&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOLing @ what passes for &#8220;fact checking&#8221; from liberals! What they call &#8220;fact checking&#8221; means whether it agrees with liberal dogma. If it doesn&#8217;t it is labeled &#8220;false&#8221;.</p>
<p>Left-wing bias in media is endemic, and a reason why they can&#8217;t see a true statement as true when it disagrees with their bias(es) and why they let leftist falsehoods go without comment.</p>
<p>It is sad that the left has gone so far around the bend that their definition of &#8220;truth&#8221; has become &#8220;does it agree with liberal dogma&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-966303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-966303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Policiians have an enormous range of platforms to state, repeat and CORRECT any misstatements they make. They prefer to have a tame audience of true believers who won&#039;t question their statements becuase it fits in with their narrative and beliefs.

Journalists have an obligation to ask questions when they think the politician is lying or misleading by ommission, it is only by holding politicians to a standard that we cna cut through the partisan bull and get politicians to be honest.

But do we really want that? It&#039;s much easier to believe the solutions are simple and that x party is bad, or brand y party or critic a socialist and if only we replaced a government everything would be sunshine and rainbows.

Critical thinking is hard and we get the government and media we deserve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Policiians have an enormous range of platforms to state, repeat and CORRECT any misstatements they make. They prefer to have a tame audience of true believers who won&#8217;t question their statements becuase it fits in with their narrative and beliefs.</p>
<p>Journalists have an obligation to ask questions when they think the politician is lying or misleading by ommission, it is only by holding politicians to a standard that we cna cut through the partisan bull and get politicians to be honest.</p>
<p>But do we really want that? It&#8217;s much easier to believe the solutions are simple and that x party is bad, or brand y party or critic a socialist and if only we replaced a government everything would be sunshine and rainbows.</p>
<p>Critical thinking is hard and we get the government and media we deserve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIW</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-965264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RIW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-965264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Om: Your political bias is showing. It&#039;s rather ironic you tell us that it&#039;s about time the media started checking facts because &quot;politicians lie,&quot; (especially those conservatives you clearly hate), but you don&#039;t bother telling people these &quot;media fact checkers&quot; are, themselves, nothing more than politicians, and hence their &quot;facts&quot; are just as suspect as any politician they&#039;re covering.

The reality is that Ryan&#039;s speech was not a &quot;new low&quot; in political lies, but the &quot;fact checkers&quot; fact checking was a new low in using &quot;fact checking&quot; as a purely political piece of theater.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Om: Your political bias is showing. It&#8217;s rather ironic you tell us that it&#8217;s about time the media started checking facts because &#8220;politicians lie,&#8221; (especially those conservatives you clearly hate), but you don&#8217;t bother telling people these &#8220;media fact checkers&#8221; are, themselves, nothing more than politicians, and hence their &#8220;facts&#8221; are just as suspect as any politician they&#8217;re covering.</p>
<p>The reality is that Ryan&#8217;s speech was not a &#8220;new low&#8221; in political lies, but the &#8220;fact checkers&#8221; fact checking was a new low in using &#8220;fact checking&#8221; as a purely political piece of theater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Curtis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-964892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-964892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a flaw in the first sentence of the article. It is up for debate whether Paul Ryan&#039;s speech was &quot;riddled with inaccuracies.&quot; There are numerous articles defending his speech.

So when you start your article with this very flawed premise, the rest of the article is basically doomed.

See part of the problem with the media is the dishonesty. Just because lots of media say someone is lying doesn&#039;t make it so. And just because someone says that they will lower the oceans doesn&#039;t make it so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a flaw in the first sentence of the article. It is up for debate whether Paul Ryan&#8217;s speech was &#8220;riddled with inaccuracies.&#8221; There are numerous articles defending his speech.</p>
<p>So when you start your article with this very flawed premise, the rest of the article is basically doomed.</p>
<p>See part of the problem with the media is the dishonesty. Just because lots of media say someone is lying doesn&#8217;t make it so. And just because someone says that they will lower the oceans doesn&#8217;t make it so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txpatriot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-963211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[txpatriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-963211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt since the &quot;old media&quot; obviously aren&#039;t living up to your standards, why don&#039;t YOU become a fact checker?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt since the &#8220;old media&#8221; obviously aren&#8217;t living up to your standards, why don&#8217;t YOU become a fact checker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Wright</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-962724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-962724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the interesting thing about facts--where do you get your fact from--when did you get them, and why are you so certain they are facts????  Take for example the issue of  Ryan voting against something he railed about.  Well, did any of you or the FACT checkers ask him why he voted the way he did?? Quite often it is due to some problematic point, not the bill as a whole.  Just because a &quot;media source&quot; cannot be found does not make the contention untrue!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the interesting thing about facts&#8211;where do you get your fact from&#8211;when did you get them, and why are you so certain they are facts????  Take for example the issue of  Ryan voting against something he railed about.  Well, did any of you or the FACT checkers ask him why he voted the way he did?? Quite often it is due to some problematic point, not the bill as a whole.  Just because a &#8220;media source&#8221; cannot be found does not make the contention untrue!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenJohn Menendez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/fact-checking-politics-why-we-need-open-journalism-more-than-ever/#comment-962718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StephenJohn Menendez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558320#comment-962718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are seriously using Media Matters as a source?
By using them you lose all credibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are seriously using Media Matters as a source?<br />
By using them you lose all credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
