<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Samsung&#8217;s new patent threats an offer to cross-license with Apple?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghodagadi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-975175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghodagadi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-975175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read somewhere today that Apple has been acquiring non FRAND LTE patents.  True?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere today that Apple has been acquiring non FRAND LTE patents.  True?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-964028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-964028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well that&#039;s part of the problem isn&#039;t it. Apple patents stuff that makes Samsungs innovation desireable but isn&#039;t quite standards essential. Samsung patents innovation without which the industry wouldn&#039;t be possible so are legally obliged to license it. Apple are just abusing a faulty US patent system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s part of the problem isn&#8217;t it. Apple patents stuff that makes Samsungs innovation desireable but isn&#8217;t quite standards essential. Samsung patents innovation without which the industry wouldn&#8217;t be possible so are legally obliged to license it. Apple are just abusing a faulty US patent system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-963306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Observer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-963306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah those greedy Apple bastards. 

Samsung phones are made by little elfs for the good of mankind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah those greedy Apple bastards. </p>
<p>Samsung phones are made by little elfs for the good of mankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puntam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-960531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puntam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-960531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re missing an important point.  This threat from Samsung is coming at at this strategic time simply because the iPhone 5 release is just around the corner.

Regardless of the US verdict and appeal it really isn&#039;t as meaningful as we North Americans ignorantly believe it to be.  Growth in the mobile industry resides to the greatest degree in Asia, where similar suits are falling like dominoes.

And as Apple trumpets the victory horns on the home field, Samsung is quietly pumping their attention to those more important markets.

Litigation will only buy Apple a finite amount of time, and in techyears time is only a blink of the eye.  Apple needs to get back to what it is that THEY do best - their current focus in my opinion is simply greed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re missing an important point.  This threat from Samsung is coming at at this strategic time simply because the iPhone 5 release is just around the corner.</p>
<p>Regardless of the US verdict and appeal it really isn&#8217;t as meaningful as we North Americans ignorantly believe it to be.  Growth in the mobile industry resides to the greatest degree in Asia, where similar suits are falling like dominoes.</p>
<p>And as Apple trumpets the victory horns on the home field, Samsung is quietly pumping their attention to those more important markets.</p>
<p>Litigation will only buy Apple a finite amount of time, and in techyears time is only a blink of the eye.  Apple needs to get back to what it is that THEY do best &#8211; their current focus in my opinion is simply greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: budanski</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-959065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[budanski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-959065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jurors were fretted by both sides and both sides knew he owned patents. Did your Groklaw tell you that none of the jurors owned an iphone and the foreman hadnt owned a mac in years?

You need to stop listening to uneducated pundits... http://seekingalpha.com/article/835091-apple-s-verdict-will-likely-survive-appeal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jurors were fretted by both sides and both sides knew he owned patents. Did your Groklaw tell you that none of the jurors owned an iphone and the foreman hadnt owned a mac in years?</p>
<p>You need to stop listening to uneducated pundits&#8230; <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/835091-apple-s-verdict-will-likely-survive-appeal" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/835091-apple-s-verdict-will-likely-survive-appeal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delax</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-959011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-959011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple did chip in a couple billion dollars or so for Nortel&#039;s patents that included LTE patents..so Apple has LTE patents also. Samsung has more but it&#039;s about quality and not quantity. Who has the more valuable LTE patents? Who knows. I&#039;m pretty sure Apple will be buying LTE chips from Qualcomm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple did chip in a couple billion dollars or so for Nortel&#8217;s patents that included LTE patents..so Apple has LTE patents also. Samsung has more but it&#8217;s about quality and not quantity. Who has the more valuable LTE patents? Who knows. I&#8217;m pretty sure Apple will be buying LTE chips from Qualcomm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-958877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pkj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-958877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G - It depends quite a bit on what the actual claims in the patents of concern say.  If the claims are bounded by the area of the chip then they are probably exhausted.  But I would bet some of the claims have elements that go outside of the Intel (or other) chips - like referring to memory, or an antenna, or a handheld system ... Then you need to look much closer and have the lawyers argue about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G &#8211; It depends quite a bit on what the actual claims in the patents of concern say.  If the claims are bounded by the area of the chip then they are probably exhausted.  But I would bet some of the claims have elements that go outside of the Intel (or other) chips &#8211; like referring to memory, or an antenna, or a handheld system &#8230; Then you need to look much closer and have the lawyers argue about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natclayful</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-958648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[natclayful]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-958648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is rich enough...but if you think about it they are also scared too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is rich enough&#8230;but if you think about it they are also scared too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eldernorm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-958640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eldernorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-958640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do question this article a bunch.  There are too many writers that just do not understand that Apple has no desire to license its ideas to people that want to make junk.   They licensed items to Microsoft with the proviso that Microsoft not copy Apples design.  

It really is straight forward and this whole idea of mega copying comes from when these other cell phone builders do not innovate, but rather just copy each other and try to make the cheapest phone they can.   Like the race to the bottom that Dell and HP etc engage in.   Everyone makes the same thing and changes the color of the case. 

Apple is pushing the boundaries in many areas from ease of use, to functionality, to sturdiness, to UI.   And I do not think its going to stop. 

Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do question this article a bunch.  There are too many writers that just do not understand that Apple has no desire to license its ideas to people that want to make junk.   They licensed items to Microsoft with the proviso that Microsoft not copy Apples design.  </p>
<p>It really is straight forward and this whole idea of mega copying comes from when these other cell phone builders do not innovate, but rather just copy each other and try to make the cheapest phone they can.   Like the race to the bottom that Dell and HP etc engage in.   Everyone makes the same thing and changes the color of the case. </p>
<p>Apple is pushing the boundaries in many areas from ease of use, to functionality, to sturdiness, to UI.   And I do not think its going to stop. </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eldernorm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/30/are-samsungs-new-patent-threats-an-offer-to-cross-license-with-apple/#comment-958621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eldernorm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=558102#comment-958621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee Michael, hate Apple much.???  I disagree with Groklaw.   
Gee stop people that have any idea about anything, lets see, law, patent, electronics, use a cellphone, etc, etc. 
I would not call that a jury of peers, would you.??  

The results were done quickly but well. Just listen to the foreman.  Even he thought differently when he first started but the evidence made him change his mind.   Blatent copying is not right.  Even Google told them that. 

Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Michael, hate Apple much.???  I disagree with Groklaw.<br />
Gee stop people that have any idea about anything, lets see, law, patent, electronics, use a cellphone, etc, etc.<br />
I would not call that a jury of peers, would you.??  </p>
<p>The results were done quickly but well. Just listen to the foreman.  Even he thought differently when he first started but the evidence made him change his mind.   Blatent copying is not right.  Even Google told them that. </p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
