<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pure Storage scoops up $40M in validation of all-flash push</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/15/pure-storage-scoops-up-40m-in-validation-of-all-flash-push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/15/pure-storage-scoops-up-40m-in-validation-of-all-flash-push/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:10:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keninca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/15/pure-storage-scoops-up-40m-in-validation-of-all-flash-push/#comment-904305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keninca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=553122#comment-904305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everybody needs that, nor can they afford it.  I don&#039;t think you will see companies giving 10GB of free storage if it&#039;s all on SSD (at least not for 5 generations of silicon, but then magnetic storage will still be a lot cheaper, and companies will be offering 1 TB of free storage.  On HDDs.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everybody needs that, nor can they afford it.  I don&#8217;t think you will see companies giving 10GB of free storage if it&#8217;s all on SSD (at least not for 5 generations of silicon, but then magnetic storage will still be a lot cheaper, and companies will be offering 1 TB of free storage.  On HDDs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hannan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/15/pure-storage-scoops-up-40m-in-validation-of-all-flash-push/#comment-900941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Hannan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=553122#comment-900941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because SSD is at least two orders of magnitude &quot;better&quot; with speed and power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because SSD is at least two orders of magnitude &#8220;better&#8221; with speed and power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keninca</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/15/pure-storage-scoops-up-40m-in-validation-of-all-flash-push/#comment-900464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keninca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=553122#comment-900464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$3/Gbyte and they think they can be nearly everywhere?  That&#039;s $3,000 per TByte if my math is correct, or at least two orders of magnitude more than magnetic storage.  So how can they be nearly everywhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$3/Gbyte and they think they can be nearly everywhere?  That&#8217;s $3,000 per TByte if my math is correct, or at least two orders of magnitude more than magnetic storage.  So how can they be nearly everywhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
