5 Comments

Summary:

Amazon launched a “Send to Kindle” extension for Google Chrome that lets users send articles to their Kindle. Other services, like Pocket and Instapaper, can do the same thing. Which one should you use?

send to kindle chrome extension

Hoping to compete with services like Pocket (formerly Read It Later) and Instapaper, Amazon has launched a “Send to Kindle” browser extension for Google Chrome. Support for Mozilla Firefox and Apple Safari is coming soon.

You can download the extension from the Chrome Web Store. Once installed, it sends “news articles, blog posts and other web content” to Kindle, removing advertising and other distractions. You can also preview text before you send it or send only selected text on a page.

I tested “Send to Kindle” versus Pocket on my Kindle Touch and iPad. I sent this Pinterest iPad app article by my colleague Eliza Kern and this YouTube video about a cat and a tortoise to both.

Send to Kindle on iPad

Send to Kindle

On Kindle Touch: The Pinterest article arrived on Kindle Touch within a minute. The formatting looks good, with pictures obviously rendered in black-and-white. Links are intact and work in Kindle Touch’s experimental web browser.

The video does not work on Kindle Touch. It pulls all the text and still photos from the YouTube page.

On Kindle for iPad: Pictures in an article render in color and break up the flow of the text. (See screenshot, right.) This is also a problem in Pocket, but the design’s a little better.

Pocket on iPad

Pocket

On Kindle Touch: The process for getting Pocket articles onto a Kindle e-reader is not super-easy. You have to download your reading list into free ebook management tool Calibre. Then you can send the file wirelessly to Kindle using Amazon’s Send to Kindle desktop version or email it to your Kindle email address.

Once you’ve done this, though, the reading process is great: Calibre compiles all of the articles into a magazine-like format that is easy to read on your Kindle. (If you use Instapaper, the process is easier — learn how to do it here.) So you can keep all of your articles in one “magazine” instead individually downloading them and storing them as separate files on your Kindle, the way you do with Send to Kindle.

Pocket supports the saving of videos, but you won’t be able to watch them on a Kindle Touch.

On Pocket for iPad: Easy and looks great when you have the Pocket iPad app installed. You can save all kinds of content, not just text. So I can watch my cat and tortoise video just fine.

Which one should you use?

The Send to Kindle Chrome browser extension is a good way to send text and articles to your Kindle e-reader quickly. If you want to get a single long article onto your Kindle, I’d go with the Chrome extension. But if you want to read many articles together in a magazine-like format, I really like Pocket, and I wish Kindle would  let you send a whole reading list, not just a single article.

If you primarily use Kindle for iPad, you shouldn’t use the Send to Kindle extension. Use a read-it-later service like Pocket or Instapaper instead. They render text and graphics better, and Pocket lets you save video, not just text.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. I use Instapaper’s send to kindle link. While I typically add to Instapaper and have a daily batch of articles go to my Kindle, If there is something I don’t want in that batch, I can use Instapaper’s send to Kindle bookmarklet. Quick and easy.

  2. I generally use Instapaper for the magazine approach to my Touch or Pocket to send to the iPad. However, I recently found a site that just wouldn’t work in either of them. I had to cut and paste several pages worth of stuff into Word and then save as .txt to get rid of some weird background color stuff. I lost all the italics, which was annoying. The Send to Kindle extension, however, handled it perfectly. I clipped just the story (without the 300-odd comments) and got exactly what I needed. Okay, it was just one site, but it was nice to find something that handled it well.

  3. What an awful article. Compare apples to apples, err oranges to oranges, for Christ’s sake. Comparing the iPad to the Kindle Touch is like comparing a Nokia 6110 to the iPhone. The least you could do is compare Amazon’s most comparable product in the Fire.

    At least the author’s bias toward Apple is transparent, and this article could have been summed up in 3 sentences: “Everything looks great and works seamlessly with the iPad. Everything is black and white (blah!) on the Kindle Touch. I love Apple products!!”

    Full disclosure: I am an AAPL owner and a link on the Yahoo’s price quote page drove me here. I never comment on internet articles, but this one was so horribly biased I had to express my opinion. Laura should put a qualifier at the top of this article: “I am an Apple fangirl so don’t expect an impartial article.”

    1. The vast majority of people using a Kindle or the Kindle app are either using an e-ink Kindle like the Touch or the iPad app, so it’s perfectly reasonable to focus on the experience on those 2 devices.

  4. Nice. I’m all about Kindle (device and app and most importantly, reading everywhere across my many multiple devices), so this is good news.

Comments have been disabled for this post