<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMC: Lenovo deal won&#8217;t impact Cisco relationship. Really.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim c</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/#comment-874564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549327#comment-874564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe anyone&#039;s buying this statement. Of course, EMC is going to SAY this, but their actions are completely the opposite. Look at what EMC/Vmware has done in the past year to Cisco:

VMware releases vSphere 5.0 with huge vtaxes. This completely screws Cisco as Cisco&#039;s big differentiator in market was huge server memory capabilities.

VMware buys Nicira for network virtualization. This directly competes with Cisco. Directly.

EMC partnering with a low cost server manufacturer that competes directly with Cisco. Sure, EMC can claim they&#039;re in different markets but do you really think that EMC isn&#039;t going to influence Lenovo&#039;s products? How long before Lenovo servers look more like Cisco servers?

EMC appears to have unofficially declared war on Cisco. They&#039;re just trying to do it indirectly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe anyone&#8217;s buying this statement. Of course, EMC is going to SAY this, but their actions are completely the opposite. Look at what EMC/Vmware has done in the past year to Cisco:</p>
<p>VMware releases vSphere 5.0 with huge vtaxes. This completely screws Cisco as Cisco&#8217;s big differentiator in market was huge server memory capabilities.</p>
<p>VMware buys Nicira for network virtualization. This directly competes with Cisco. Directly.</p>
<p>EMC partnering with a low cost server manufacturer that competes directly with Cisco. Sure, EMC can claim they&#8217;re in different markets but do you really think that EMC isn&#8217;t going to influence Lenovo&#8217;s products? How long before Lenovo servers look more like Cisco servers?</p>
<p>EMC appears to have unofficially declared war on Cisco. They&#8217;re just trying to do it indirectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Darrow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/#comment-873905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb Darrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549327#comment-873905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No VCE mandate here. Although i do love Monty Python.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No VCE mandate here. Although i do love Monty Python.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cuthrell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/#comment-873715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Cuthrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549327#comment-873715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barb -- The logic jumps here are curious to say the least. I&#039;m left wondering... Is there an internal thread within GigaOm that mandates VCE be viewed as a Monty Python BOYD skit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barb &#8212; The logic jumps here are curious to say the least. I&#8217;m left wondering&#8230; Is there an internal thread within GigaOm that mandates VCE be viewed as a Monty Python BOYD skit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Knieriemen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/#comment-873668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Knieriemen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549327#comment-873668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can understand the skepticism but not being a partner or customer of either, I really do believe Lenovo Servers and UCS are completely different types of solutions and different use cases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the skepticism but not being a partner or customer of either, I really do believe Lenovo Servers and UCS are completely different types of solutions and different use cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic Logix</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/02/emc-lenovo-deal-wont-impact-cisco-relationship-really/#comment-873658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magic Logix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549327#comment-873658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great video about Lenovo&#039;s Thinkserver rd240 hardware. http://lnv.gy/OIfpBl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great video about Lenovo&#8217;s Thinkserver rd240 hardware. <a href="http://lnv.gy/OIfpBl" rel="nofollow">http://lnv.gy/OIfpBl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
