<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silk scores $1.6m to build its own semantic web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/silk-scores-1-6m-to-build-its-own-semantic-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/silk-scores-1-6m-to-build-its-own-semantic-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ardire</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/silk-scores-1-6m-to-build-its-own-semantic-web/#comment-872590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Ardire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=548876#comment-872590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for them on getting funding but building own semantic web sounds too proprietary and closed for a small little player vs perfectly good W3C semantic web standards + semantic enterprise methods if you know what the heck you&#039;re doing !

The fine folks from NEA obviously know little about this subject matter so were probably wowed by this looks cool ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for them on getting funding but building own semantic web sounds too proprietary and closed for a small little player vs perfectly good W3C semantic web standards + semantic enterprise methods if you know what the heck you&#8217;re doing !</p>
<p>The fine folks from NEA obviously know little about this subject matter so were probably wowed by this looks cool ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
