<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Need for speed: California&#8217;s clean power buildout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/#comment-877191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emmanuel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549121#comment-877191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pls i wont to be one of your member]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pls i wont to be one of your member</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/#comment-874854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549121#comment-874854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typo -- Germany installed 7.5 GW in 2011.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo &#8212; Germany installed 7.5 GW in 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/#comment-874852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549121#comment-874852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany installed 7.5 GW in 201.  However, 3 GW was in the month of December alone showing the pace at which distributed PV can be installed in a mature market with a forcing policy mechanism (in this case, impending FIT decline).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germany installed 7.5 GW in 201.  However, 3 GW was in the month of December alone showing the pace at which distributed PV can be installed in a mature market with a forcing policy mechanism (in this case, impending FIT decline).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ucilia Wang</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/#comment-873851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ucilia Wang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549121#comment-873851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case there is any confusion, solar isn&#039;t the only renewable energy that qualifies under California&#039;s RPS program. Germany is the largest solar market in the world, but its installation rate is slowing. And that rate isn&#039;t 1 GW per month. The forecast is 6-8 GW of PV in Germany for 2012 (Bloomberg New Energy Finance and IHS).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case there is any confusion, solar isn&#8217;t the only renewable energy that qualifies under California&#8217;s RPS program. Germany is the largest solar market in the world, but its installation rate is slowing. And that rate isn&#8217;t 1 GW per month. The forecast is 6-8 GW of PV in Germany for 2012 (Bloomberg New Energy Finance and IHS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Advocate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/need-for-speed-californias-clean-power-buildout/#comment-873393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Energy Advocate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549121#comment-873393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California&#039;s solar buildout can&#039;t be called fast by any real comparison. 
In Q1 2012 New Jersey deployed more solar.

Compare the 2.7 GW estimate for 2012 for CA to Germany deploying 1 GW *per month*.
And Germany is doing it cheaper per Watt.
And California has 70% better solar resources.
And Germany is doing it with small-scale systems that don&#039;t require expensive, controversial transmission lines

California&#039;s lagging performance when compared to the rest of the world can only be considered a failure of California energy policy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California&#8217;s solar buildout can&#8217;t be called fast by any real comparison.<br />
In Q1 2012 New Jersey deployed more solar.</p>
<p>Compare the 2.7 GW estimate for 2012 for CA to Germany deploying 1 GW *per month*.<br />
And Germany is doing it cheaper per Watt.<br />
And California has 70% better solar resources.<br />
And Germany is doing it with small-scale systems that don&#8217;t require expensive, controversial transmission lines</p>
<p>California&#8217;s lagging performance when compared to the rest of the world can only be considered a failure of California energy policy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
