<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How one startup wants to inject Hadoop into your SQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Mueller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-870663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus Mueller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-870663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, why trying to add relational features to a non-relational platform like Hadoop in the first place? Wouldn&#039;t it be better to leverage the existing SQL engines (they already came quite a long way!) and add MapReduce to such a platform like Aster Data used to do it? Just my 2 cts...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, why trying to add relational features to a non-relational platform like Hadoop in the first place? Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to leverage the existing SQL engines (they already came quite a long way!) and add MapReduce to such a platform like Aster Data used to do it? Just my 2 cts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-869230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 03:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-869230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, a relational database is any database that stores tables of relations.  Its query mechanism is largely undefined, for joins can always be performed separately via a different set of machines, forming a pipeline if you need high join throughputs.  Not supporting JOIN in the core-level query language not sufficient for a database to not be relational.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a relational database is any database that stores tables of relations.  Its query mechanism is largely undefined, for joins can always be performed separately via a different set of machines, forming a pipeline if you need high join throughputs.  Not supporting JOIN in the core-level query language not sufficient for a database to not be relational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsjoerg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-868577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dsjoerg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-868577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curious to get the fuller story about this JOIN nonsense, I turned to twitter, where I see Bradford saying &quot;Actually, it&#039;s supporting joins in October. And you don&#039;t need joins for rich functionality. Denormalize.&quot; http://bit.ly/Qj5W5d

So, it doesn&#039;t support JOIN, but it plans to real soon now!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious to get the fuller story about this JOIN nonsense, I turned to twitter, where I see Bradford saying &#8220;Actually, it&#8217;s supporting joins in October. And you don&#8217;t need joins for rich functionality. Denormalize.&#8221; <a href="http://bit.ly/Qj5W5d" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Qj5W5d</a></p>
<p>So, it doesn&#8217;t support JOIN, but it plans to real soon now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Henderson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-868409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Henderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-868409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you know they don&#039;t support joins. Do they have a public beta?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know they don&#8217;t support joins. Do they have a public beta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradford S.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-868408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bradford S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-868408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We support JOIN. Your argument is invalid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We support JOIN. Your argument is invalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro Gagliardi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/how-one-startup-wants-to-inject-hadoop-into-your-sql/#comment-868397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alessandro Gagliardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545849#comment-868397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drawn-to-Scale&#039;s version of &quot;SQL&quot; does not support JOIN operations. This means it is not relational. This means it is not SQL. Even Hive has the dignity not to call it&#039;s query language &quot;SQL&quot; though HiveQL is significantly closer to SQL than this. Don&#039;t believe the hype.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawn-to-Scale&#8217;s version of &#8220;SQL&#8221; does not support JOIN operations. This means it is not relational. This means it is not SQL. Even Hive has the dignity not to call it&#8217;s query language &#8220;SQL&#8221; though HiveQL is significantly closer to SQL than this. Don&#8217;t believe the hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
