<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head to head: Amazon cloud beats Google on video benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/for-some-workloads-googles-cloud-cant-yet-hang-with-aws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/for-some-workloads-googles-cloud-cant-yet-hang-with-aws/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/for-some-workloads-googles-cloud-cant-yet-hang-with-aws/#comment-868638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545923#comment-868638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a fair point, although I&#039;d argue that you can&#039;t get much more apples-to-apples than just comparing the highest-powered instances on both clouds. Right now, Amazon just has the HPC market cornered with CCI.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fair point, although I&#8217;d argue that you can&#8217;t get much more apples-to-apples than just comparing the highest-powered instances on both clouds. Right now, Amazon just has the HPC market cornered with CCI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Yeager</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/24/for-some-workloads-googles-cloud-cant-yet-hang-with-aws/#comment-868630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Yeager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=545923#comment-868630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think calling this an apples-to-apples comparison is a bit of a stretch.  The fact of the matter is that they are comparing AWS&#039;s cluster compute instances which are designed specifically for this type of workload to GCE&#039;s largest standard instance which is designed to fit a variety of workloads.  It is a good comparison of the best possible performance you can achieve from each cloud for this type of workload, but in my opinion this is different than an apples-to-apples comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think calling this an apples-to-apples comparison is a bit of a stretch.  The fact of the matter is that they are comparing AWS&#8217;s cluster compute instances which are designed specifically for this type of workload to GCE&#8217;s largest standard instance which is designed to fit a variety of workloads.  It is a good comparison of the best possible performance you can achieve from each cloud for this type of workload, but in my opinion this is different than an apples-to-apples comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
