<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thousands of YouTube partners now make six figures a year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Coruzzi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-867273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Coruzzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-867273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol. 128 gig  RED Mags are $1,250 each.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol. 128 gig  RED Mags are $1,250 each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlso2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-866767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carlso2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-866767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To hear that it&#039;s only thousands making 6 figures is sad. The scale of entertainment it provides to the world should provide more earnings potential than that. Youtube is about as popular as TV among some age groups.

This thing should be viewed thru glasses like the app-store model. There is no reason content creators shouldn&#039;t getting 70% of the proceeds that viewing / ads generate. Using Google&#039;s network to play a video should be in line with these other renumeration models.

If they made it more lucrative, then more interesting content will be created. Since Google isn&#039;t a content company, they still don&#039;t really understand this.

They should take a lesson from Steve Jobs, and really allow these various   developers to make some money. 

I know they survive on taking a ride on everyone&#039;s content with their ad model, but it&#039;s simply too greedy in it&#039;s current form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To hear that it&#8217;s only thousands making 6 figures is sad. The scale of entertainment it provides to the world should provide more earnings potential than that. Youtube is about as popular as TV among some age groups.</p>
<p>This thing should be viewed thru glasses like the app-store model. There is no reason content creators shouldn&#8217;t getting 70% of the proceeds that viewing / ads generate. Using Google&#8217;s network to play a video should be in line with these other renumeration models.</p>
<p>If they made it more lucrative, then more interesting content will be created. Since Google isn&#8217;t a content company, they still don&#8217;t really understand this.</p>
<p>They should take a lesson from Steve Jobs, and really allow these various   developers to make some money. </p>
<p>I know they survive on taking a ride on everyone&#8217;s content with their ad model, but it&#8217;s simply too greedy in it&#8217;s current form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. B.M</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-866468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. B.M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-866468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A billion for me... 100k for you... another billion for me... 100k for you.
Man I can&#039;t understand how companies like Viacom and Disney, that are usually hard asses just bent over and let their content make YouTube what it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A billion for me&#8230; 100k for you&#8230; another billion for me&#8230; 100k for you.<br />
Man I can&#8217;t understand how companies like Viacom and Disney, that are usually hard asses just bent over and let their content make YouTube what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cas127</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-866020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cas127]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-866020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Thousands of YouTube partners are making over $100,000 a year&quot;

Yeah...but they are making it on *YouTube&quot;...they could have a lot of already rich partners coming in...

I know that is a Clintonian spin on the statement...but I am always very suspicious of any entity that talks about how wonderful things are - but for some ill-defined reason always declines to provide specific numbers/information.

For example, let&#039;s talk specifics about the NY Times paywall subscribers...well, we can&#039;t, can we?

Because the NYT (&quot;All the News We See Fit to Print&quot;) provides *very few* specific numbers (what is their churn for instance?)

Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thousands of YouTube partners are making over $100,000 a year&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah&#8230;but they are making it on *YouTube&#8221;&#8230;they could have a lot of already rich partners coming in&#8230;</p>
<p>I know that is a Clintonian spin on the statement&#8230;but I am always very suspicious of any entity that talks about how wonderful things are &#8211; but for some ill-defined reason always declines to provide specific numbers/information.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s talk specifics about the NY Times paywall subscribers&#8230;well, we can&#8217;t, can we?</p>
<p>Because the NYT (&#8220;All the News We See Fit to Print&#8221;) provides *very few* specific numbers (what is their churn for instance?)</p>
<p>Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko Roettgers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-865983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-865983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I&#039;m not exactly sure how those Vevo artists are going to use their gift cards :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not exactly sure how those Vevo artists are going to use their gift cards :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rotman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/19/thousands-of-youtube-publishers-now-make-six-figures-a-year/#comment-865977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rotman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=544691#comment-865977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of those channels are using Red and Scarlet&#039;s so sort of odd to offer them $500 gift cards for video equipment. Maybe for the memory cards?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of those channels are using Red and Scarlet&#8217;s so sort of odd to offer them $500 gift cards for video equipment. Maybe for the memory cards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
